Comment
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed framework that would enable the removal of bike lanes in favour of vehicle lanes on municipal and city roads. This approach not only contradicts the growing body of evidence supporting cycling infrastructure but also jeopardizes public safety and the well-being of our communities.
Numerous studies around the world have shown that bike lanes significantly reduce traffic congestion. For instance, cities like Amsterdam and Copenhagen, which have prioritized cycling, consistently report lower vehicle traffic and improved mobility for all road users. In contrast, removing bike lanes would lead to increased gridlock and pollution, undermining the progress we have made toward sustainable transportation.
Furthermore, protected bike lanes save lives. Research published in the American Journal of Public Health highlights that cities with robust cycling infrastructure experience fewer cyclist injuries and fatalities. In many cases, the presence of bike lanes makes roads safer for everyone, including motorists.
The proposed framework risks reversing these important gains, negatively impacting our environment, public health, and the safety of cyclists. I urge you to reconsider this proposal and instead invest in expanding, not reducing, our bike lane network.
Submitted October 22, 2024 11:10 AM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
101688
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status