Commentaire
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed framework that would enable the removal of bike lanes in favour of vehicle lanes on municipal and city roads. This approach not only contradicts the growing body of evidence supporting cycling infrastructure but also jeopardizes public safety and the well-being of our communities.
Numerous studies around the world have shown that bike lanes significantly reduce traffic congestion. For instance, cities like Amsterdam and Copenhagen, which have prioritized cycling, consistently report lower vehicle traffic and improved mobility for all road users. In contrast, removing bike lanes would lead to increased gridlock and pollution, undermining the progress we have made toward sustainable transportation.
Furthermore, protected bike lanes save lives. Research published in the American Journal of Public Health highlights that cities with robust cycling infrastructure experience fewer cyclist injuries and fatalities. In many cases, the presence of bike lanes makes roads safer for everyone, including motorists.
The proposed framework risks reversing these important gains, negatively impacting our environment, public health, and the safety of cyclists. I urge you to reconsider this proposal and instead invest in expanding, not reducing, our bike lane network.
Soumis le 22 octobre 2024 11:10 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
101688
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire