Comment
Key problems the Province is trying to address (which may not be obvious) and not necessarily with our CA:
Graft: Instances of board members owning construction businesses and being elected by municipalities.
Conflict of Interest: Board members from municipalities who, in theory, should be subject to the same approval processes as everyone else.
Resource Allocation: Some CAs fund studies and side projects that are misaligned with their core mission—sometimes politically motivated.
Regulatory Overlap: The Province already has a regulatory ecosystem for environmental protection (water, wildlife, parks, etc.). Conservation authorities were originally intended to manage land for water-related purposes—potable sources, drainage, flood events—and collaborate with regulators. Over time, some CAs have shifted toward advocacy roles, duplicating efforts of other ministries.
Cost Control: Preventing CAs from becoming vehicles for municipal fundraising; they should be self-funded without additional taxpayer dollars.
Pre-clearances: With decades of mapping and data, technicians should know upfront the viability of most projects. Approvals should take no more than five days, with decisions based on science.
These are just some thoughts I believe are shared by others. After reviewing the Province’s proposal, I see a framework that begins to address these issues. I realize this may be unpopular, but as much as I dislike many of the Province's proposals, this one rings a chord.
Submitted November 17, 2025 11:01 AM
Comment on
Proposed boundaries for the regional consolidation of Ontario’s conservation authorities
ERO number
025-1257
Comment ID
171944
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status