Commentaire
This is a painfully misguided bill. The idea that “another lane will fix it” is so out of touch, it has been debunked and memed and tested and nothing good ever comes of just dedicating more space to cars. Cars which primarily have only one person in it. This bill is just virtue signalling some small group of people obsessed with hating bike lanes. If the province wanted to improve mobility and reduce gridlock, it wouldn’t be focused on cars, but on high speed rail, bus services, last mile transit, shared bike infrastructure, better accessible access… there’s so much potential to do great things, that removing a safe and healthy mode of transport is truly ridiculous. Bike lanes are beautiful!
Cars which primarily infrastructure does not scale. If we continue to depend on every person getting their own car, we’ll just need another highway in a few years. Our cities get further apart, and it becomes even harder to commute.
Now is the time to commit to actually removing gridlock. Not by making room for the gridlock to grow, but by literally reducing the amount of vehicles creating the gridlock in the first place. Give people better alternatives.
Supporting documents
Soumis le 23 octobre 2024 9:46 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
102681
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire