Commentaire
I strongly oppose this bill. Urban Toronto should be for everyone, not only motorists. Those 3 specific bike lanes are some of Canada’s most used and successful. From an economic perspective, pedestrians and cyclists are much more likely to stop, shop and eat at the many shops they pass, bringing economic vitality to these routes (as opposed to cars which require parking in order to stop and explore an area). Cycling is also a healthier and more environmentally positive mode of transportation than increased car reliance.
Similar to Toronto’s King St streetcar corridor, these bike lanes make the roads quieter and safer for everyone, and bring higher density of cycling and foot traffic which fuels the street side businesses.
Ontario cannot go backwards; car prioritization is not sustainable and we need to encourage cycling, walking and transit as the optimal routes within our urban hubs.
I supported Mr. Ford in the prior election - I will 100% vote against Mr. Ford if this bill is passed.
Thank you for reviewing my feedback. Cheers.
Soumis le 3 novembre 2024 5:13 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
112156
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire