Addressing Ontario’s…

Addressing Ontario’s government on Bill 212, which proposes the removal of bike lanes to prioritize car traffic, several key arguments demonstrate why this move is counterproductive for mobility and regional development:

1. Negative Impact on Sustainable Mobility: Removing bike lanes discourages active transportation, which includes cycling and walking. Cities worldwide are moving toward sustainable and active transportation modes, reducing car dependency, lowering emissions, and improving air quality. Bike lanes play a crucial role in providing safe, accessible infrastructure that encourages cycling as an alternative to cars, thus aligning with sustainability goals.

2. Increased Traffic and Congestion: Prioritizing cars by removing bike lanes doesn’t necessarily reduce gridlock. In fact, studies show that inducing demand for cars worsens congestion. Cities like Copenhagen and Amsterdam have demonstrated that increasing bike infrastructure leads to lower car traffic by giving people attractive alternatives. By removing bike lanes, Ontario could inadvertently increase car congestion and decrease overall road efficiency.

3. Economic and Community Benefits: Bike lanes positively impact local economies. Cyclists are more likely to stop at local businesses, as they can park easily and don’t face the limitations of car parking. Streets designed for multi-modal use, including biking, are also known to attract people to neighborhoods, promoting vibrant, economically resilient communities.

4. Public Health and Safety: Encouraging cycling and walking through dedicated bike lanes promotes physical activity, with long-term health benefits like reduced rates of heart disease, obesity, and diabetes. Bike lanes also provide a safety buffer for cyclists, making cycling a feasible option for a broader demographic, including families and less-experienced cyclists. Removing these lanes compromises safety, discouraging people from choosing this healthy mode of transportation.

5. City Appeal and Quality of Life: Modern urban development increasingly prioritizes human-centered design, including extensive bike and pedestrian networks, as they are key indicators of a livable city. By opting for car-centric policies, Ontario risks diminishing its appeal as a progressive, forward-thinking region, potentially deterring young professionals and families seeking a sustainable lifestyle.

By reconsidering this aspect of Bill 212, Ontario can align with global urban development best practices, create more efficient transportation networks, and invest in a healthier, more vibrant future.