As a homeowner, taxpayer,…

As a homeowner, taxpayer, and citizen of the City of Toronto, I rely on walking, biking, driving, and public transit to navigate our city. I am strongly opposed to Bill 212, which purports to address congestion on Ontario’s municipal roads. Prioritizing motorists to “save time” or “get drivers where they need to go faster” disregards the safety and well-being of all road users, including cyclists, scooter users, e-bike riders, and pedestrians.
This bill appears to favor motorists passing through neighborhoods rather than prioritizing those who live, work, and shop within them. Why does this legislation overlook the safety and needs of vulnerable road users? Studies consistently highlight the economic, health, environmental, and safety benefits of bike lanes, which enhance the quality of life for everyone.
Key Points:
1. Safety: Bike lanes provide a safer environment for cyclists. Removing them forces cyclists to share the road with cars, increasing the likelihood of accidents and congestion when cyclists must “take the lane.” This outcome is neither efficient nor safe.
2. Environmental Benefits: Encouraging cycling reduces car usage, leading to improved air quality. With dedicated bike lanes, people are more likely to choose cycling, especially for short trips, which benefits the environment and urban sustainability.
3. Health: Cycling is a healthier mode of transportation, promoting physical activity and reducing healthcare costs in the long term.
4. Economic Impact: Bike lanes support local businesses. Cyclists can stop and park their bikes more easily than drivers can find car parking, particularly in busy urban areas like downtown Toronto. Studies show that bike-friendly infrastructure boosts local economies.
City councils are best positioned to determine the configuration of their streets. They have the expertise to study traffic flow, consult stakeholders, and balance the needs of all users. Streets should be safe, inclusive spaces that reflect the needs of the communities they serve. The province lacks the local knowledge required to make these decisions and should respect municipal autonomy.
I do not support removing bike lanes or provincial interference in street planning. Instead, I urge the government to withdraw this proposed legislation and redirect any funds intended for removing bike lanes to areas of provincial jurisdiction, such as education and healthcare. This would be a far more effective and responsible use of taxpayer dollars.
Thank you for considering this perspective.