Increasing the supply of…

Increasing the supply of housing does not need to come about by what amounts to removing protection of endangered species in Ontario as is proposed in Schedule 5 of Bill 108. The government's claim that these changes will improve outcomes for species as risk is simply not true. The only improvement proposed is the proposal to apply inspection powers for regulatory exemptions. However, the 2,000 harmful activities that have occurred since 2013 shows how abusive regulatory exemptions have been. Not allowing them would be preferable to allowing them with inspection powers.

There are so many things wrong with this proposal, here are just a few.

Listing of species at risk should be based on science, not politics and COSSARO membership should not be broadened.
The fact that a species exists outside of Ontario is not a reason to deny protection to that species in Ontario. The effects of climate change on the environment and species means we need extra caution to protect species that are currently at the northern edge of their range.
The Minister should not be allowed to remove or delay species protection. This invites political meddling and places vulnerable species in peril.
Do not allow the Minister to delay indefinitely the Government Response Statements. These must be done in a timely manner.
Do not allow proponents of harmful activities to pay into a fund. Keep the current requirement of actions providing real benefit to the species harmed.

Ontario has been a world leader for its legislation on species at risk. This proposal will put us in line with those who have no environmental concerns.

It is not only possible, but essential to balance business and housing with environmental preservation.