Commentaire
Plase explain how a government can reduce our protection against climate change by restricting the critical work of the conservation authorities who are our Natural Heritage and water resource experts. This act is clearly to remove any obstacles for developers to develop through our greenbelt, forests, farmland.and not in the publics best interests WHATSOEVER. How can you justify such blatant irresponsibility with decades of scientific evidence of how critical our Natural Heritage and water resource systems are to sustaining HEALTHY COMMUNITIES. This shortsighted, irresponsible planning is not smart urban planning for 21st century issues. Your planning is taking Ontario decades backwards and will inevitable cost billions to the taxpayor to absorb dev. Charges and to pay for impact of climate change. Such absolute unawareness in environmental science is mind-boggling and unacceptable governance for 21st century well documented evidence of how extremely critical smart growth is to sustaining healthy communitues, Please get educated to the issues of our times and let go of outdated cash cow irresponsible planning.
Soumis le 7 décembre 2022 5:01 PM
Commentaire sur
Modifications proposées à la Loi sur l’aménagement du territoire et à la Loi de 1997 sur les redevances d’aménagement : Fournir une plus grande certitude quant aux coûts des redevances d’aménagement municipales
Numéro du REO
019-6172
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
80637
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire