Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19143

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support Bill 66 and, in particular, Schedule 10. I am very concerned that Bill 66 will have negative consequences for the environment, drinking water, air and land pollution, farmland, human health, and democracy. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19155

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This change in the planning act will dramatically reduce environmental protections for drinking water, farmland, and the greenbelt. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19177

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Comments on Bill 66 - New Regulation under the Planning Act for Open-for-Business Planning Tool Based on years of experience dealing with the shortcomings of an application to re-open an old toxic landfill in: • class one wetland • in Carolinian forest Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19193

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The rules and regulations that protect Ontarians and their future is not red tape. They are the result of years of experience, science and research, and policy reform. This does not mean that all Ontarians and especially developers will agree with them, but they exist for a reason. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19222

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Sections 5 and 10 should be removed from Bill 66. The impact on the environment and on the citizens in communities throughout Ontario would be irreparable should this bill be passed as is. It would lead to the loss of natural heritage areas, threaten the safety of our drinking water, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19230

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

In no way should the Green Belt be open to development. This is land that needs to be protected for future generations. Why take such a short-sighted view for possible short-term gain. Ontario's land and natural resources are a precious gift to all of us who live in our province. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19241

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a young water sciences professional working in the field of Coastal Stewardship and Management, and someone who's read the proposed amendments to the Planning Act- I do not support the proposed amendments. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19242

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66 Schedule 10 should be abandoned for reasons I stated in comments to other proposals. There is no need for this law for municipalities to be open for business. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19261

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am opposed to this tool because it will allow for the overriding of important policies and plans that provide protection of our natural environment. There is no right of appeal with an open-for-business by-law.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19267

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am horrified at the prospect of Bill 66! Kingston is one of Canada's most historic cities. A bill like this would threaten their preservation.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19302

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am very concerned that Bill 66 will allow heritage structures to be inappropriately altered or even demolished through overriding other legislation and safeguards (such as municipal Official Plans and the Local Planning Appeals Tribunal appeals process). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19310

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Breaking the promise not to open up the Greenbelt, Lake Simcoe Watershed, the Oak Ridges Moraine and source water protection areas to new development shows a fundamental disrespect to voters. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19340

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The most dangerous aspect of Bill 66 is that it will allow municipalities to bypass critical environmental regulations as long as at least 50 new jobs are created. This will effectively gut the most important environmental protections in the province including: the Greenbelt Act Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19406

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Not in favour of Bill 66. The policy takes away the right of the normal planning processes put in place to protect our lake areas providing the development is for business. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19413

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Thank goodness that the city of Cambridge and neighbouring municipalities have had the good sense to opt out of this bill! It could do great harm! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19420

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support Bill 66 to remove the protection of the Planning Act and Provincial Policy Statements for significant built heritage resources and significant cultural landscapes anywhere in the Province of Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19430

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Professional Planners Institute

Statut du commentaire

January 18, 2019 Michael Helfinger Intergovernmental Policy Coordination Unit 900 Bay Street, Hearst Block, 7th Floor Toronto, ON M6H 4L1 Ken Petersen Provincial Planning Policy Branch 777 Bay Street, 13th floor Toronto ON M5G 2E5 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19431

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We are ABSOLUTELY AGAINST Bill 66. Business and industry is only one part of a successful and healthy province. You must keep the regulations already in place to protect our water, our recreation and green space, our farmland and our communities and to control green house gases. Lire davantage