Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20212

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am opposed to the proposed provisions in Schedule 10 of Bill 66 which basically allows businesses and developers to sidestep acts which have been implemented to protect the safety of water sources Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20214

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please reconsider this bill. It does not protect small rural towns from being taken advantage of by big buisness in terms of contaminated fill. Small towns will be the targets of rich businesses looking to dump contaminated soil and can not afford to fight them or stop them. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20218

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am extremely concerned that the passing of Bill 66 will allow large industrial developments to be shielded from LPAT appeals. Currently, our air, soil, water and forests are protected. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20219

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Proposed Bill 66: Restoring Ontario's Competitiveness Act is BAD for our environment, our water, our air, our health. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20220

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I disagree with the act and believe it is a major step backwards for the protection and health of our children, our land and our water. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20223

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Drinking water and the environment is important for me. It represents the future and our responsibilities to our children. Any policies that go against the interests of our future generation should not be implemented. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20227

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Section 10 of Bill 66 undermines decades of legislation by all of previously elected governments. It is undemocratic by doing away with any public consultation prior to bi-laws being enacted. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20232

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Regarding Schedule 3.. I am against removing restrictions on home-based child care. Lowering the standards and allowing more children per adult is reckless. Too many little ones in one place are difficult to manage. Has not a child died because of overcrowding?? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20235

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Greenbelt must be protected from development, completely. Once it’s been developed it can’t be returned to it’s natural state, which is of vital importance to Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20236

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am opposed to Bill 66 in its entirety. This bill intends to override or repeal many policies previously enacted for the protection of the health, safety and legal rights of Ontario’s citizens. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20237

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The changes proposed in Bill 66 directly contradict statements that the Conservatives government under Doug Ford will protect the Greenbelt. What Ontario does not need is more urban sprawl. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20238

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am strongly opposed to Bill 66! The Ontario government has vowed to protect the Green Belt indefinitely, why is it being opened up for development? This only benefits land developers and big businesses but it's putting everyone at risk. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20241

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Life is not about competition, it is about cooperation. This Bill, particularly Schedule 10, is profoundly regressive. If we continue to favour greedy developers, how are we going to feed the population when all the farm land is paved over?

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20243

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

In its current for, I absolutely: • Oppose Bill 66 – Schedule 10 • Oppose the open-for-business planning Tool • Oppose the New Regulation under the Planning Act for open-for-business planning tool Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20244

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is with profound concern that we learned of your proposed changes to processes that are in place for municipalities. We understand your identifying the need to reduce red tape which on the surface is a great ideal. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20248

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please don't build on the green belt, we need it as farm land to feed ourselves and trees and plants to clean the air. We need to live in harmony with nature, strike a balance. We are not in balance/harmony currently and will destroy the earth if we don't put the environment first.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20249

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

My comments concern Schedule 10 of the proposed Bill 66, “Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act”. I am writing as a professional working in the field of land use planning and environmental consulting, and I submit these comments with this experience and knowledge in mind. Lire davantage