Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17895

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please delete schedule 10 from Bill 66. I want the Greenbelt to continue to be protected as a critical and environmentally sensitive area for our watershed and as a result, much of the environment around it. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17896

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The green belt must be protected. The wildlife that live there are important and must have a place to reside. We don't need more pollution entirely the opposite and we need the farmland not housing in the greenbelt

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17897

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a concerned tax paying citizen of this province I strongly recommend that you Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17898

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17899

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please do not change the Green Belt and laws surrounding it. The current Green Belt makes southern Ontario stronger and healthier by protecting at-risk species, providing space for recreational activities, and preserving our biodiversity.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17901

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I'm a physician in York Region , with farming roots on the Oak Ridges Moraine going back to the early 1800's . My forebears would be amazed at the changes , many of them good. But clean air, clean water, and fresh local food are more important now than ever . Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17902

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am against this bill because it gives businesses the ability to flout essential environmental protections that we, as a larger society, have agreed are important.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17903

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17904

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please leave the greenbelt alone. We need as much of a buffer as possible. If you are worried about housing more people, build more multi unit buildings -- go up, not out. The "urban sprawl" in this area is not healthy, too expensive for most "ordinary folks", causing more concrete and less trees.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17905

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I believe that Schedule 10 should be removed from Bill 66. I do not believe municipalities should be able to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17910

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17912

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is important that the government removes Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17913

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Green belt should remain 100% protected. Doug Ford keep your business buddies from having anything to do with it. It is disgraceful and short sighted.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17914

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Save the Green Belt! Do not displace the few safe places for our endangered wild life. Do not give in to corporate greed. Stop contributing to global warming, PLEASE. THANK YOU

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17915

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I don’t want the Greenbelt - home to 5,500 farms, 78 species at risk and 102 million tonnes of carbon storage - carved up with factories and subdivisions. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17916

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

More generally, CELA finds that the unjustifiable content of Bill 66, and the erroneous “red tape” language used by the government to describe the Bill’s legislative intent, is highly reminiscent of the dangerous deregulation agenda that was carried out by the Ontario government prior to the Walkert Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17918

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17920

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The very notion of disrupting a very sensitive Eco system for development is not only short sighted for the future of our children but it also suggests that Mr. Ford quite ignorant toward anything but making money. The big question is who will pay the price? Lire davantage