Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20103

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Bill 66 should not be approved. Section 39 of the Clean Water Act requires that source water protection plans are followed by new developments to ensure the health and safety of the public. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20104

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This bill is a terrible, retrograde, and anti-democratic piece of legislation, effectively side-stepping essential environmental and other protections. These protections were put in place over decades, by elected governments of different parties, based on significant research and consultation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20105

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I disagree with many of the proposals made in this bill. Eliminating protections put in place for consumers doesn't cut red tape, it cuts consumer protections. Eliminating environmental protections doesn't cut red tape, it cuts environmental protections. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20106

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am writing to ask you to remove Schedules 5 and 10 from the proposed Bill 66, Restoring Ontario's Competitiveness Act, 2018. These sections needlessly threaten essential health and safety protection for Ontario residents. Schedule 5 repeals needed controls on toxic substances. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20107

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20108

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The significance that the current provincial government is placing on Bill 66 and labeling it ‘Open for Business' is misleading and lacking in real detail. The specifics of what is being proposed are deliberately being withheld. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20109

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I do not support this and believe it is a ridiculous assumption to think this will in any way increase Ontario's competitiveness in any positive manner. If at all increased in competitiveness, it will be offset by the assets we will devalue along the way. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20112

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
We need development too be smart. Getting rid of environmental regulation is not smart; it is short sighted and will have negative impacts. These impacts will be to future health, recreation, and economics of the citizens of Ontario. Please reconsider. Thank you.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20113

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20114

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Dear Conservative government, I would like to remind you what good governance is - and how Bill 66 S. 10 and S. 5 was presented is not an example of good governance. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20115

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Go very slow on freeing up developers discretion to do what they want . Laws and regulations have been put in place to prevent them from taking undue advantage and doing too much collateral damage . Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20119

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
We are so disgusted by the current Ontario Government's actions that my husband (a physician) and I (a consultant) are considering leaving the province of Ontario and taking our money with us (which is all the current government seems to care about). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20122

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
No to Bill 66. I grew up in the Greenbelt - my grandparents lived on a rural property in Raglan, Ontario, in a Designated Natural Heritage Systems area. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20124

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I'm incredibly concerned about the provincial government's plan to sidestep very important provisions of a number of environmental protection acts with this act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20134

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
With respect to Bill 66, I urge the government to take its responsibility to protect the environment seriously. This Bill opens to doors to open the Greenbelt to development, which will harm currently protected areas from environmental damage. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20137

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Repealing any laws that negatively impact our long term health is damaging and short sited! Do not open the greenbelt for development. Do not repeal or give exceptions to environmental regulations put in place to preserve our water or the environment at large. We need these ecosystems to survive!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20139

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Repealing of red tape is an honourable objective. Endangering Ontarians' health and undermining critical environmental protections in the process is unacceptable. Bill 66 threatens the Clean Water Act and repeals the Toxics Reduction Act. It will allow circumvention of Greenbelt protections. Lire davantage