Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21026

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As a concerned and committed citizen of Ontario, I appeal to our provincial government to repeal Bill 66 and leave in place theToxics Reduction Act, 2009. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21030

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
We strongly oppose bill 66. The premier while running for office said that the greenbelt would be protected. Bill 66 does not protect our farmland, our precious water, does not have respect for the animals who live in our woods. This is not democracy at work. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21033

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The "Made in Ontario" environmental plan previously released by this government stresses the importance of trust and transparency. This proposal speaks to neither of those two things. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21037

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The Province of Ontario’s proposed Bill 66 allows for provincial intervention to remove or weaken protections on safe drinking water, agricultural lands, and democratic consultation. Further, planning exemptions granted under Bill 66 would not require notification or consultation with residents. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21042

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Bill 66 will undermine the need for density in development and will allow for urban sprawl to occur. Development needs to occur only in areas where dense development is already occurring. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21044

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21045

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As a concerned and committed citizen of Ontario, I appeal to our provincial government to repeal Bill 66 and leave in place theToxics Reduction Act, 2009. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21046

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Opening our Green Belt for development will put 2 million acres of natural areas, habitats and wetlands at risk of development. Not only will it put many animal species at risk, it will greatly threaten our drinking water with increased exposure to toxic chemicals. Don't let this happen. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21054

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I oppose Bill 66. Clear explanation of the reason for these changes should be provided. Changes to childcare standard could easier lead to abuse and quality of care. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21057

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This legislation would be a disaster for the future of Ontario's children and the environment. Important safeguards that have been developed over many years for our water, land and air are being dismantled. Why? Another disaster could occur such as the tragedy of Walkerton!!!! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21061

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
My main concern with Bill 66, are the changes to the Planning Act. It makes environmental & water related protections, which are there to ensure public health as well as the health of our environment, elective rather than mandatory. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21068

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Do not open the greenbelt for development. No one believes that is a good idea. Not in the interests of building affordable housing, and not in the interest of creating employment. Those are lies. This is an obvious and irreversible land grab, money grab, and it is ill-advised. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21069

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I do not want Bill 66 to remove the protection of the Planning Act and Provincial Policy Statements for significant built heritage resources and significant cultural landscapes anywhere in the province.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21070

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am a property owner living in a Greenbelt protected heritage community. I strongly value the existing protections that limit development and protect the environment. I am opposed to the proposed changes of Bill 66.