Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

49188

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There are two parts of this document that are especially concerning. "While it’s possible that the prescribed activities may interfere with the water supply for other users and may include discharge to the natural environment..." Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

49236

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

My name is Warren Lusk P.Geo. and I am currently the Director and President of Lusk Geo Inc. specializing in groundwater, water well and geothermal issues and education. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

49416

Commentaire fait au nom

Municipal Engineers Association

Statut du commentaire

Very supportive of the initiative to allow short term water taking activities such as well development, pump tests and road construction to be processed under the EASR system and also the requirement to involve QP's . Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

49523

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

1) I believe that the TSS and Turbidity for discharge should be the fixed value you are proposing of 25 mg/L and 8 NTU respectively, in the case were there there is no local sewer use by-law rather than a blanket limit. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

49602

Commentaire fait au nom

Regional Municipality of Halton

Statut du commentaire

Proposed amendments should incorporate protections to groundwater quantity threats as identified through the Clean Water Act, 2006. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

49636

Commentaire fait au nom

Paradise Developments

Statut du commentaire

Recommended Removal of EASR for Construction Site and Road Construction up to 400,000L/day: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

49652

Commentaire fait au nom

Taggart Construction

Statut du commentaire

Hello, How would you be able to determine what is storm related water and what is groundwater when dewatering from an open pit? is it just a calculation made by a QP and then deducted from the total amount of water taken?

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

49653

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Pump tests related to permits to take water for commercial bottling should not be included in the exemptions listed for low risk short-term water taking activities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

49723

Commentaire fait au nom

Dillon Consulting

Statut du commentaire

Can you please provide a copy of the draft regulations for review to understand the details of how the changes to the regulation will be implemented?

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

49729

Commentaire fait au nom

Township of Puslinch

Statut du commentaire

RE: Environmental Registry Number 019-2422, 019-2525 and 019-2517 – Proposals to Amend Legislation related to Water Takings Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

49741

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Federation of Agriculture

Statut du commentaire

On behalf of the Ontario Federation of Agriculture, please find attached our submission with respect to ERO # 019-2525. Thank you. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

49742

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

November 19, 2020 Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks 135 St. Clair Ave West 1st Floor Toronto, ON Email: juwairia.obaid@ontario.ca Attn: Juwairia Obaid, P.Eng., MASC Senior Program Advisor Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

49774

Commentaire fait au nom

Wellington Source Water Protection

Statut du commentaire

Please see attached municipal comments on host municipality resolution and EASR changes for water takings. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

49779

Commentaire fait au nom

The City of Guelph

Statut du commentaire

The City of Guelph appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed regulatory changes under the Environmental Protection Act and Ontario Water Resources Act to streamline permissions for certain low risk short-term water taking activities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

49780

Commentaire fait au nom

Conservation Ontario

Statut du commentaire

Please see the attached document for Conservation Ontario's comments on the "“Proposed amendments to regulations made under the Environmental Protection Act and Ontario Water Resources Act to make modifications to Environmental Activity and Sector Registry requirements and exemptions for low risk sh Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

49782

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Construction Dewatering Supported Changes • Stantec supports the proposed changes to allow up to 400,000 L/day for each pit based on its dewatering area of influence. • Stantec supports not including storm water in the 400,000 L/day EASR limit Potential Challenges Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

49791

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Mississauga

Statut du commentaire

Greetings, On behalf of our municipality, I would like to submit the following comment on this proposal. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

49792

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Ontario Power Generation supports the removal of restrictions for EASR related to construction site dewatering.