Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50342

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Very concerned resident of the area. Enough chemicals and issues already in this area. This area is mostly residential with schools and children. Not in our backyard please.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50365

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This seems very hazardous and dangerous to nearby residents! There are a large number of concerned neighbours who oppose this amendment. Not to mention the negative implications it can have on the value of the area as a whole. No more chemicals!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50619

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We asked for additional details, as the base description of the proposal indicates some scary chemicals being emitted into the air in one of the most heavily toxic parts of Toronto. (According to city air quality studies). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50707

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

NO to this ECA. I am very much opposed to this proposal from Digital Specialty Chemicals Ltd. I am a nearby resident and this area is already saturated by toxic chemical emissions from several manufacturing facilities that operate on Coronation Drive. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

51696

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Acoustical Classification The acoustic classification in the ECA states that class 1 is used for acoustic assessment - this is factually incorrect. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

51697

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We live just off Beechgrove Drive, close to the facility generating this pollution. I'm firmly against this proposal. First of all, using Covid as an excuse to hide key information from the public is highly suspicious. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

52027

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I find it hard to believe that this is being considered since it abuts and environentally protected area and surrounded by residential neoghbourhoods. We need to reduce our exposure to harmful chemicals, not increase it.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53434

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There are multiple schools and many families that live in this area. Adding further pollutants to our air would be bad for our health. Please don’t let this happen.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53497

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

• Because of the large numbers of chemicals entering the thermal oxidizer 24/7/365, stack testing should be required by MECP on a regular basis, including testing for dioxins and furans. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53499

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

POI emission numbers in this application are based on the future use of a thermal oxidizer that will cut some emissions dramatically, and others by 50% or more. However several findings from Entegris Air Quality Peer Review conducted by RWDI No 2103192 raise several concerns: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53534

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I live close by this facility and have a number of concerns. We were alerted in 2014 when sirens sounded due to an explosion at the facility. An employee received second degree burns after a canister exploded, blowing out block walls and two large hinged doors. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53549

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Isn't there a school (Joseph Brant) just to the northwest of this site, on the other side of Manse Park? This doesn't seem like the right place for a chemical plant that spews emissions into the air.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53565

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

RESUBMITTING. FIRST SUBMISSION WAS PRESUMABLY LOST AS I DID NOT RECEIVE CONFIRMATION FROM ERO THAT IT WAS RECEIVED. I HAVE APPLIED EDITS TO MY ORIGINAL BELOW Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53571

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I live north/west of the facility occupied by Digital Chemical Specialties (Entegris) located at 470 Coronation Drive. I have serious concerns related to the Environmental Compliance Application by the proponent. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53584

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

A recent air quality peer review raises concerns about clarity and transparency regarding emissions and particulate matter coming from this plant. The method of calculating emissions from by-products of combustion from a proposed thermal oxidizer were not provided in the report. Lire davantage