Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

62759

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

No, Mr Ford, We do not need quick fixes but innovative, long term solutions that do not trample on the rights of the citizens or destroy the environment. This act does both of those things and incidentally lines the pockets of rapacious developers who are only interested in profits. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

62866

Commentaire fait au nom

Township of Amaranth

Statut du commentaire

I am writing on behalf of the Township of Amaranth in order to outline our specific concerns with the More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022. Our specific concerns pertain to proposed changes to the following legislation: Planning Act; Development Charges Act, 1997; and Conservation Authorities Act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

62893

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 23 takes a short sighted approach that would potentially result in less livable communities, with environmental impacts passed on to taxpayers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

62999

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This Bill has serious consequences for the vital environmental services that Conservation Authorities provide in Ontario. Removing considerations of environmental impact and pollution is not scientifically sound. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63020

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am against changes to conservation authorities’ scope of practice, and to opening the green belt for development. We have seen in other countries and in Canada itself what poor environmental planning can cost a country. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63058

Commentaire fait au nom

Seguin Township

Statut du commentaire

Good morning, Please find attached a Resolution from Seguin Council. In summary, it is requested that the definition for "development" in proposed Section 41(1.2) of the Planning Act only pertain to developments within a "parcel of urban residential land", or this provision be deleted. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63206

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I realize it may be the intent of Bill 23 in part to remove third party appeals or "neighbour" appeals of Planning Act approvals, particularly private applications. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63233

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

DO NOT strip powers from the municipalities as they are the local communitys democratic voice DO NOT remove existing wetland and woodland protections DO NOT create a process for selling off conservation lands without oversight DO NOT encourage urban sprawl

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63279

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Cons: * Padding developer pockets * Paving vital wetlands * Removing municipality ability to require green initiatives, impose climate change policies or urban design principles * Increased urban sprawl Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63445

Commentaire fait au nom

Clean Air Partnership and Clean Air Council

Statut du commentaire

Please see attached for Clean Air Council input for the concerns regarding Bill 23 and municipal green standards authorities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63697

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support this bill because of its expansion into the green belt, wetlands and sensitive ecological areas in Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64371

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 23 - (More Homes Bult Faster Act 2022) by the province’s Conservative government attempts to create more housing through amendments to the Planning Act primarily for the benefit of urban areas, but leaves many rural communities reeling at the inevitable fallout . WITHDRAW THIS BILL. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64800

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is absolutely abysmal. We all know that the people who need homes won't be able to afford the million dollar, poorly built monstrosities that you want to construct far away from any amenities! This is very clearly Ford's plan to put money into the pockets of developers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64826

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please consider amending the restriction on third party appeals. As currently drafted, it would prevent a landowner from appealing a municipally-initiated Zoning By-law (Amendment) or Official Plan (Amendment) or Secondary Plan to directly applies to a landowner's property. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64829

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please consider a mechanism or framework to permit inclusionary zoning units (rental), affordable unit (rental), and attainable units (rental) to be included within an overall condominium structure for a development, so that it is not necessary to "carve out" these units from a condominium, while st Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65423

Commentaire fait au nom

Region of Durham

Statut du commentaire

Streamlining Municipal Planning Responsibilities Requires Further Review: Recommend “Upper Tier Municipalities with Limited Planning Responsibilities” with a transition period Lire davantage