Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66424

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Instead of destroying our green belt and destroying animals homes, we should start looking at buildings that are abandoned and creating them into apartments for low income housing.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66425

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Our protected greenbelt must remain protected! Ontario doesn't need sprawling suburbs and more cars on the road, Ontario needs higher density housing and better public transit to better serve our residents. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66426

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The greenbelt was promised to always be protected and it should be. I'm strongly against it being open to any sort of development. It's home to wetlands, animals etc. Protect the greenbelt.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66428

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I think it is absurd to weaken the rules on this. New infrastructure can destroy the land meant to be there to protect wildlife. We are already living in a world where the environment is taking a toll due to our consumption and how we live; thus, we must protect the little wildlife we have. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66429

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We need to be protecting our land, not destroying more of it. Our impact on the environment is already huge, we don’t need to add more. Find better uses for empty buildings/lots in cities instead

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66430

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal is two terrible ideas in one. It's getting rid of natural habitats and replacing it with urban sprawl. It's clear Ford doesn't have the best interests for Ontario. We need more densification and walkable communities. Traffic is already absolutely terrible.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66432

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As the global climate continues to become more unstable, it is imperative that we maintain our green spaces. Urban sprawl should not invade the greenbelt, especially as the provincial government promised not to touch it. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66435

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

In 2018 Doug Ford looked directly into a camera and said "If they don't want me to touch the Greenbelt, I won't touch it." He needs to be held accountable to this. DO NOT TOUCH THE GREENBELT. I do NOT support bulding ANYTHING on the Greenbelt!!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66437

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We do not need this highway. We need to protect the conservation areas. We need raises for our nurses. We need lower wait times in hospitals. We need better education systems. We need help with student loans. We need affordable, wheelchair accessible, low income housing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66438

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Ford government is planning to create a development in the green belt. The public is not going to stand idly by. Upon previous overviews of his policy, he has stated in years past that the green belt/ conservation areas would be protected. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66439

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I have lived in Ontario my whole life and I am a student studying environment and business at the university of Waterloo. Developing on this protected area will have so many consequences for both people and the environment that we cannot undo. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66440

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I'm concerned that these new homes will not be available to low/middle income people that need them the most. And this will be at the expense of many animals' habitats. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66441

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

If this proposal is approved it will do so much damage you mine as well dump toxic waste into Toronto’s drinking water. The catastrophic environmental domino effect that will occur will devastate southern Ontario for generations. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66443

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Why not use the unused office building space we already have available in Toronto, instead of expanding needlessly into the greenbelt (destroying our wildlife)? Please consider the future of Ontario - do the right thing, leave the greenbelt untouched. There are other solutions.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66444

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I feel like utilizing empty government buildings and work buildings as housing/condos either low income or not would be a more beneficial way to repurpose what is already in existence; and not take more land away from the animals and plants that need to thrive for the environment. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66445

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There is no need to develop the Greenbelt. It is protected for a reason. Deregulating wetland and wetland adjacent land is detrimental to Ontarian ideals. This amendment will negatively impact greenspace for generations, as there is no undoing the damage that will be done by building here. Lire davantage