Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73219

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support removal or redesignation of green belt land. This land is an important natural area that should continue to be protected. It should not be sold for profit. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73228

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Using the greenbelt for anything other than its intended purposes will lead to another crisis further down the road that we won't be able to fix. Destruction of natural wetlands, forests, and habitats can not be rebuilt at will. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73235

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Halton has been dug into enough. If you develop more green belt now we’ll pay for it later with limited natural resources and increased global warming. Stop ruining natural land. We don’t need more houses - we need to spread our farther than Toronto. Stop. Canada is huge stop being so greedy.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73237

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The ON government’s attempt to develop part of the Greenbelt & attack municipal democracy is beyond scandalous. It shows contempt for the citizenry and the environment. There are other responsible ways of dealing with housing needs. Municipal democracy doesn't belong to developers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73239

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am not supportive of this proposal. For years, the Premier has made promises to not touch the Greenbelt, so this proposal erodes the trust of Ontario residents. In addition, expanding land available for building houses is not the answer. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73241

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Sensitive Agricultural lands, watershed, greenspace, forests, etc. absolutely need to be preserved for the longevity of life. If we don't preserve these areas, they will disappear and never come back. Development can easily happen on marginal lands outside of the sensitive areas. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73247

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 23 is a strong-armed attempt by the provincial government to override existing and well-considered municipal procedures of both the right of notification and the right to review development proposals. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73249

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Urban sprawl into the Greenbelt is not an acceptable way to protect our futures. These lands have been protected in order for our drinking water to be as clean as possible, and our farmland to be as fertile as possible. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73251

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support changes to the Greenbelt for development. This is protected area for a reason, and there is ample other land that would be far more suitable for housing. Urban sprawl is not helping with affordability or climate change. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73263

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to express my strong opposition to your proposal to remove 7,400 acres from the Greenbelt (ERO #019-6216 and #019-6217). I do not accept your government’s misleading premise that these Greenbelt lands are needed for housing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73266

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not agree with the proposed changes. The Greenbelt is a stronghold for biodiversity, farmland, flood mitigation, and carbon sequestration. The need for more housing does not mean we should be removing greenspaces and habitat in order build them. Build up, not out. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73275

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am very much against this proposal. Slowly chipping away at protected lands of the Greenbelt in order to profit development companies is a dangerous and slippery slope. We should be focusing on more long-term and sustainable practices like urban densification, not urban sprawl. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73280

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please do not remove ANY lands from the Greenbelt. That land is precious. We have more than enough space to add residences in land that is already developed, and it only makes sense to increase our density, not to sprawl farther and farther, destroying nature along the way. Lire davantage