Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73848

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I've lived in Ontario for 15 years now and this has to be one of the worst plans for housing development I've seen. No affordability clauses just more urban sprawl. Your own report on the act even identifies these issues. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73849

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please don't do this. Build more housing by increasing density. Make our cities more efficient with better public transit so we don't need to waste so much space on parking lots. Increase foreign buyers taxes and fix the landlord tenant board.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73852

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal is an absolute sham and borderline criminal. It is particularly insulting as it stands to enrich developpers with NO GUARANTEE of benefits to the public. PUBLIC LAND SHOULD SERVE THE PUBLIC. If it is to be developped, it should be guaranteed community housing / afforbable housing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73853

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Developing the green belt is going to destroy what makes Toronto so great and turn it into a hellscape like LA. This should only be considered after gentrification and redeveloping low density neighborhoods. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73857

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal is an absolute sham and borderline criminal. It is particularly insulting as it stands to enrich developers with NO GUARANTEE of benefits to the public. PUBLIC LAND SHOULD SERVE THE PUBLIC. If it is to be developed, it should be guaranteed community housing / afforbable housing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73858

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please do not make changes to the greenbelt. The promise was explicitly made by the current government that the greenbelt would not be touched. Keep this promise, or seek a referendum vote. Anything else is undemocratic.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73860

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This plan MUST be scrapped entirely. How dare you continue to line the pockets of wealthy developers even more while screwing over Ontarians? There is absolutely NO guarantee you crooks will ensure any new development will be made affordable. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73861

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There is no need to destroy the greenbelt. There are many other options as is listed below. In a time of climate change - we need as much green areas as we can. Sprawl doesn’t help anyone- as the work from home made clear to many people. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73862

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal should be criminal. If we pave over the green belt, what do we eat? What do our children eat? Imported crap from China? In case I was unclear, this proposal is a terrible idea and only serves to line the pockets of his builder friends.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73863

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Building on public lands to enrich developers is corruption. There is more than enough land available to build within city limits. Don’t do this. Covid showed us how terrible urban sprawl is-workers no longer having to drive hours every day to get to and from work. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73864

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The greenbelt land should not be developed until all other options have been exhausted. I do not believe the government has done their due diligence in exploring other options and I fear destroying the greenbelt for houses will have many unintended consequences to our water and food supply. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73867

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Planning growth through sprawl is an outdated and greedy idea. People have been asking for density, you do the opposite. You say you'll never touch the green belt, you do the opposite. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73869

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Here, you've already done the homework https://www.ontario.ca/page/housing-affordability-task-force-report You don't need to destroy the greenbelt and line the pockets of corrupt politicians and developers to "solve the housing crisis" Lire davantage