Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64918

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Ford government is seriously off target by aiming Build More Homes Faster initiatives at the Niagara Greenbelt. Pursuing this proposal will "Kill Greenbelt Biodiversity Even Faster". Once the damage is done it will be irreparable. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64936

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I oppose new development within the existing greenbelt, and particularly in the Oak Ridges Moraine. The Oak Ridges Moraine is a critical aquifer for Ontario, and is immensely important to the replenishment of Toronto's river systems. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64943

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Greenbelt Area should be kept as-is without development for the future generations & not destroying the environment.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64955

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed changes to the Greenbelt Area boundary are appalling. Hamilton residents have spoken clearly that we do NOT want our boundary expanded. While there is a housing crisis in Hamilton building more homes in these outer areas will not address the issue. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64972

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is a horrible idea we need to protect the green space we have. To deal with the housing crisis we can address the zoning and capacity of currently developed areas. Leave the green belt alone and allow for sustainable development of current areas

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64981

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As an Ontarian, I strongly disagree with the plan to remove land from the Greenbelt. This will set precedent for additional removal of the Greenbelt and have serious ramifications on our environment. It seems like Premier Ford doesn't have his priorities straight. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65016

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not believe it is necessary to develop any of the greenbelt, cities instead should be developing within their existing borders and adding a mix of different housing styles and densities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65051

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I, a Canadian Citizen and resident of Ontario, would like to enter into record that I am vehemently opposed to these potential amendments. While I acknowledge the housing crisis is of utmost importance I emplore the government to look for solutions elsewhere. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65055

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I, a Canadian Citizen and resident of Ontario, would like to enter into record that I am vehemently opposed to these potential amendments. While I acknowledge the housing crisis is of utmost importance I emplore the government to look for solutions elsewhere. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65059

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a resident of Ontario who is currently priced out of owning a home, housing is an important issue. However, the Greenbelt should remain a protected area. Allowing housing in the Greenbelt will not fix the housing crisis or affordability crisis. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65073

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not wish to see lands removed from the existing Greenbelt. Those lands were designated in 2005, less than 20 years ago. It is a shame that the government believes protecting land is a short-term endeavour. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65107

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal to open up 7,400 acres of the greenbelt is unconscionable. The Greenbelt is supposed to be protected forever. CONSERVED. There is land elsewhere to build on. I oppose this proposal. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65148

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The green belt should not be used for housing. It is a protected area. The type of housing built will not help the current housing crisis.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65153

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Ontario does not need more expanding suburban sprawl. Along with the housing crisis is an affordability crisis, and these new houses will not address that problem, which needs to be addressed. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65156

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

7500 acres of green land spaces is a high price to pay for our future ecosystems. We need to say “No” to eroding away our Greenbelt which impact so many living wildlife, plants, water and prime agricultural land must be protected for future generations. Not a wise use for housing.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65160

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We absolutely do not need to remove parts of the greenbelt to build more housing. There is a ton of usable land as well as the ability to increase density in places already occupied. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65191

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing today to register my opposition to the changes in the Greenbelt which have been made in support of bill 23 to build more homes faster bill. It is necessary for us to have a bill called the happy healthy homed Ontarians bill. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65195

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Has there been a comparison between the lands lost and the compensatory lands in terms of habitat quality and ecosystem services? What will be done to replace the ecosystem services lost in those areas when they are developed into homes? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65213

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal defies basic logic: The point of the Greenbelt is that it's closed for development. If it's opened for development it's by definition no longer protected. This is an obvious trojan horse. Lire davantage