Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66575

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly oppose any removal of lands from the green belt. I will be sharing with friends to find wider opposition to this move .

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66613

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The people are totally against this proposal. This land was protected for a reason and money and greed and back scratching will not stop. Why not use empty office buildings downtown for housing. No need to further destroy land that is essential for the well being of our future.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66615

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am fully against this proposed amendment. The green belt is meant to be fully protected farm land, wetlands and watersheds. Wetlands are the kidneys of our planet. We should be protecting our province’s wild habitats and ecosystems, not developing them. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66619

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I believe this will set a dangerous precedent going forward. Housing has become a crisis for many people and I fear if this strategy is used we will ruin what little nature we have left. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66630

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I believe that the Green Belt should remain intact. Houses can be built elsewhere. Also, there are better solutions to a housing crisis than urban sprawl. Affordable housing should be the top priority when housing is concerned.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66652

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This initiative will cause flooding. It will also build the type of housing that's not in shortage. The struggle is will low-income, high density housing, not suburban homes.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66653

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please DO NOT do this. Our green belt areas are critically important to future generations. This is an election promise Doug Ford should not renege on.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66662

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is an awful idea and will destroy an important and integral part of the southern Ontario landscape. Tourism, education and the environment will suffer and I expect that people will be up in arms over this.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66666

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is a terrible idea because it won’t improve housing for average Ontario residents. It will make Ford’s developer buddies rich and build mansions on a flood zone. Instead use all the empty office buildings in Toronto and turn them into high density low income housing.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66672

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am strongly OPPOSED to this proposal to open sections of protected Greenbelt land to development. Firstly, the Greenbelt boundaries were decided based on a variety of ecological and sociopolitical factors. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66697

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is disgusting!!! This should never even have been a thought to be able to built on the green belt! Stick to your word ford and stop with the lies and manipulation!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66706

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This plan has short term benefits with long term problems. Building and developing is still possible with the limitations that already had been set. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66707

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Find another solution to the housing problem. Do not use protected nature to fix your problems. We are AGAINST this proposal. NO negotiations. It's a HARD NO for me.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66730

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

After promising not to touch the greenbelt, Ford is trying to sneak it past us AGAIN. Enough already - stop further fragmenting our habitats. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66733

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As someone who has worked outside during the years, I've noticed the increased temperatures throughout the seasons, especially the summer. Along with this, I've noticed the increased amount of precipitation in the form of water during these warmer months. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66739

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am against the proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation. The provincial government hasn't released any evidence demonstrating its plan for the Greenbelt would actually be good for the environment. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66753

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

While providing more homes for Ontarians is a good goal, I believe it can be achieved within existing development boundaries. However, if Greenbelt lands are going to be opened up, it should be mandated that ALL building development is Passivhaus construction. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

66764

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a conservative, this is an absolutely horrendous plan. Will no longer be voting Doug Ford. I am appalled. The green belt is named so for a reason. It should not be developed.