Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77614

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Firstly the name "Green"Belt should mean Green not Black, when paving over the green it will never be back to green but remain as black (Paved over) forever. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77615

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We need to do all we can to preserve farmland. Housing can be built on land that is not suitable to grow crops. The reverse is not true. The Ford government seems hell bent on paving over some of the best farmland in Canada leaving us more dependent on imported food. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77616

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The greenbelt is an important piece of our province to all the people. It feeds us, it is home to many animals and it gives us nature. If you take that away many animals homes will be lost, many natural areas will be gone and we will not have enough food. Farms feed people. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77618

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Leave the green belt alone. There are certainly areas of Toronto and surrounding areas which can accommodate building without touching the Greenbelt. On another note all cities need to rely look at home constructions. We are loosing value able farmland that surrounds the cities.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77619

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This current generation has been doing so much to try to correct the mistakes of the past. Many of which are irreversible. Parents with young children and many of our educators have been working so hard to teach them to take care of our land and not destroy it. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77620

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Do not touch our greenbelt! It needs to stay protected that is what the people want and you need to listen to US

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77621

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Greenbelt is protected for a reason. If we do not learn from previous generations we are doomed to repeat their mistakes. Let's take steps to protect and preserve. There is too kuch at stake if we destroy it.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77622

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please do not do this. We desperately, desperately need the green belt in tact; it's a delicate ecosystem that needs to be preserved. By removing environmental protections, you are needlessly upsetting an ecosystem that contributes to our planet's safety and resiliency. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77623

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 23 is not necessary to meet the needs for new housing as we have capacity within existing urban boundaries sufficient for our needs. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77629

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Why is this an issue when Ford promised not to touch the green belt? He is not thinking ahead. We need land for farming, for green space for peoples’ mental health. The land also needs to be shared with wildlife which is also important. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77630

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There are enough areas in this province that can be used to build the proposed 1.5 million homes WITHOUT touching the Green Belt. Corporate wealth at the expense of the environment has got to stop.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77632

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am completely opposed to Bill 23 and it's proposed changes to the existing Greenbelt. Doug Ford PROMISED not to touch the Greenbelt.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77641

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Ford government has lied to us! Back in 2018, Ford said “he heard the people, hands off the greenbelt”. Now, he is going back on that promise even after the people of Hamilton said no to urban sprawl, where is the democracy in this!? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77643

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

If you don’t care about farmland or the environment I can give you several other reasons why you should be angry about Bill 23 1. It strips the Conservation authority of regulating negative impacts on wetlands/streams and rivers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77644

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am opposed to taking back the green belt in the Teston Pine Valley area. We have had a dramatic increase of housing in this general area already and need to preserve this precious green space for future generations who live around the area. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77645

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am horrified that premier Ford who had promised not to touch the greenbelt has now decided it can be developed. It is extremely concerning that a few developers have purchased greenbelt land in the past few years, which is now being removed from the greenbelt for development. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77646

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We are so disappointed at your action to cut into sacred ground abutting the Bruce trail and green space in Grimsby between us and Winona. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77647

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is wrong on all levels. Should be investigated as to why now. Someone is filling their pockets on this terrible deal. It must be stopped. We need our farmland, wetlands, and so do the wildlife need these lands.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77648

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It has been proven that you do not need to remove land from the greenbelt to meet housing targets. This is a deceitful , greedy, unnecessary move by our premier. Lire davantage