Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95054

Commentaire fait au nom

City of London

Statut du commentaire

The City of London is an active member of the Municipal Engineers Association’s (MEA) Excess Soil Working Group. The working group has met with the Ministry to discuss the proposed changes and has prepared a separate detailed submission, of which the City is supportive. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95058

Commentaire fait au nom

Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation (Waterfront Toronto)

Statut du commentaire

Waterfront Toronto is supportive of the proposed amendments to the On-Site and Excess Soil Regulation. In particular, the following proposals are beneficial to Waterfront Toronto's revitalization efforts: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95082

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Municipal Engineers Association (MEA) is please to provide its comments to ERO No. 019-7636. Our comments are attached in a separate file. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95116

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please see attached PDF document for the submission from the Ontario Home Builders’ Association Regards Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95119

Commentaire fait au nom

Township of Puslinch

Statut du commentaire

The Township of Puslinch Council submits the following comments: That Council receive Correspondence item 10.5 regarding ERO 019-7636 Proposed regulatory amendments to encourage greater reuse of excess soil; and Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95120

Commentaire fait au nom

TAPMO (Top Aggregate Producing Municipalities of Ontario)

Statut du commentaire

TAPMO (Top Aggregate Producing Municipalities of Ontario) formally objects to the Province's approval of ERO #019-7636 in order to provide additional time for a comprehensive review by municipalities and stakeholders. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95121

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Mississauga

Statut du commentaire

On behalf of the City of Mississauga, please find attached our comments regarding the ERO posting. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95122

Commentaire fait au nom

Wellington Source Water Protection

Statut du commentaire

Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this proposal. Wellington Source Water Protection staff are municipal staff representing the eight municipalities within Wellington County. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95123

Commentaire fait au nom

Brookfield Properties Development

Statut du commentaire

The proposed amendment requires a landscape or site plan be prepared and certified by an expert such as a Landscape Architect. This could add undue delay in approving a source for re-use, depending on the stage of the project. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95125

Commentaire fait au nom

Enbridge Inc.

Statut du commentaire

Hi, Please see attached Enbridge's Feedback on Proposed Excess Soil Regulation Amendments. Please, let me know if you require any other information. Thanks, Abel Government Affairs Specialist, Enbridge Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95129

Commentaire fait au nom

The Regional Municipality of Halton

Statut du commentaire

Halton Region operations staff, who are managing regional local waste transfer facilities, have raised concerns about the applicability of O. Reg. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95131

Commentaire fait au nom

Niagara Region Public Works

Statut du commentaire

Section 2) Enhanced reuse opportunities for salt-impacted soil (Section D, Part I in the Soil Rules) Comment Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95134

Commentaire fait au nom

Dillon Consulting Limited

Statut du commentaire

The proposed exemption for Aggregate Reuse Depots indicates that 'the aggregate must be known to be of a quality that it can be reused in an infrastructure project', but does not clarify the standards that would apply. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95135

Commentaire fait au nom

Dillon Consulting Limited

Statut du commentaire

For small liquid soil sites, the proposed amendment excludes material from cleaning out sewage works; however, allows for sediment from stormwater management ponds and hydrovac. Please clarify if sediment from drain and ditch clean out would be included for small liquid soil sites.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95136

Commentaire fait au nom

Dillon Consulting Limited

Statut du commentaire

Many aggregate recyclers will accept both granular product (like road base) but also asphalt and concrete. Suggest that the proposed amendments do not limit the type of materials aggregate recyclers can receive, but require segregation of the excess soil portion from the concrete/asphalt materials.