Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95137

Commentaire fait au nom

Dillon Consulting Limited

Statut du commentaire

The reuse rules for salt-impacted excess soil prohibit final placement within 30 m of a water body. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95138

Commentaire fait au nom

Dillon Consulting Limited

Statut du commentaire

Please consider in situ sampling for stormwater management ponds instead of sampling only the excavated material which will aid in preparation of contract tender documents and project planning.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95139

Commentaire fait au nom

Dillon Consulting Limited

Statut du commentaire

Please provide more explanation around the intent of this statement "Clarify that, for the purposes of selecting the applicable standards that apply to a reuse site, a reference to a change in the use of a property does not include a reference to a change in the zoning of the property under a munici Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95140

Commentaire fait au nom

Dillon Consulting Limited

Statut du commentaire

Please provide clarity on the permitted storage within 30 metres of a water body. Do the two conditions provided have to both be met, or is it either of the conditions that allow for storage within 30 m of a water body?

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95141

Commentaire fait au nom

Dillon Consulting Limited

Statut du commentaire

With respect to the reuse of salt-impacted soils on large projects with expansive Project Areas, there may be cases where the property owner has leased or permitted temporary use of land (many parcels) to the Project Leader. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95142

Commentaire fait au nom

Dillon Consulting Limited

Statut du commentaire

Based on the current structure of the Excess Soil Registry, please provide explanation of how an aggregate reuse depot would file a notice on the registry of receiving aggregate material, process it, and then send to an appropriate re-use site.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95143

Commentaire fait au nom

Dillon Consulting Limited

Statut du commentaire

Based on current wording of O.Reg. 406/19, it is understood that if any part of the project area is an enhanced investigation area, then the entire project area is treated like an enhanced investigation project area. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95144

Commentaire fait au nom

Dillon Consulting Limited

Statut du commentaire

The proposed amendments exempt landscaping projects (including construction of ponds) on EIPAs from the reuse planning requirements. It is suggested that the language be generalized from landscaping projects to work within low risk areas of EIPAs. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95151

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Sewer and Watermain Construction Association

Statut du commentaire

OSWCA Submission for ERO# 019-7636– Proposed amendments to O. Reg. 406/19: On-Site and Excess Soil Regulation and the Rules for Soil Management and Excess Soil Quality Standards Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95153

Commentaire fait au nom

Association of Consulting Engineering Companies-Ontario

Statut du commentaire

On behalf of the Association of Consulting Engineering Companies-Ontario (ACEC-Ontario), and its 140 member firms operating across the province, we are writing to provide a response to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) on the proposed amendments to Ontario Regulation 406 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95155

Commentaire fait au nom

GHD Consulting

Statut du commentaire

Thank you for providing this opportunity for comment on the proposed regulatory amendments to encourage greater reuse of excess soil. My comments and questions are provided in the attached Word document. Kindest regards, Dr. Francine Kelly-Hooper, Ph.D. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95156

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I wanted to begin this submission by highlighting our profound concern that the Ministry may not have a comprehensive grasp of how the movement of earth truly works. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95158

Commentaire fait au nom

Waterloo Region Home Builders Assoc

Statut du commentaire

We strongly believe that there continue to be opportunities for the province to streamline Ontario’s environmental approvals processes to ensure that Ontario is open for business while balancing environmental protections. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95159

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Road Builders' Association

Statut du commentaire

Please find the Ontario Road Builders' Submission attached. We will also submit via email. Thanks! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95164

Commentaire fait au nom

Liquid Soil Solutions Inc.

Statut du commentaire

Some of the proposed amendments to Reg. 406/19 are an injustice to the companies that made enormous investment, to develop innovative and new technologies to support the MECP’s objectives. Lire davantage