Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

107649

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
"2.Remove requirements for waste Environmental Compliance Approvals (ECAs) for third-party storage and processing of excess soil at aggregate reuse as well as small liquid soil processing sites, with regulatory rules to be followed instead (note: this is a revised proposal from what was previously p Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

107679

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Considering many roads were once built with slag as an aggregate, in an effort to improve flexibility for soil moved between project areas and reuse sites of infrastructure projects of the same type, could slag be included in the excess soil definition? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

112793

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
1. Community Standards in Aggregate Reuse Depots • Question: What is meant by "community standards" in the context of aggregate reuse depots? Are these standards intended to align with specific tables such as Table 1, Table 2.1, or Table 3.1 in the ESQS? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

113716

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Regarding the proposal to: Remove requirements for waste Environmental Compliance Approvals (ECAs) for third-party storage and processing of excess soil at aggregate reuse as well as small liquid soil processing sites, with regulatory rules to be followed instead (note: this is a revised proposal fr Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

116003

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the Proposed Amendments to MECP's Excess Soil Regulation Posted on ERO (019-9196). The City of Cambridge staff are generally supportive of the proposed amendments. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

116019

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Regarding sampling frequencies outside of a PCA/APEC, it's proposed to be reduced at the discretion of the QP. For consistency across the province and for receiver sites, would the MECP consider having minimum sampling frequencies, based on volume/percentage? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

116025

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
With respect to naturally occurring local background concentrations, I understand the proposed regional mapping will be addressed at a later date. I see the value in the mapping but acknowledge it could be time consuming to prepare (municipality & consultants). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117675

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Brampton

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
To Whom It May Concern, The City of Brampton (hereinafter referred to as ‘the City’) appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the proposed changes outlined in the Environmental Registry of Ontario (ERO) posting number 019-9196 – Enabling Greater Beneficial Reuse of Excess Soil. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

119939

Commentaire fait au nom

EcoVac Solutions Ltd.

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please see attached letter for EcoVac's comments on the proposed amendments to the excess soil regulations, specifically allowing liquid receiving sites that plan to receive up to 100m3 of liquid soil an exemption from the ECA process which EcoVac strongly opposes. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

120169

Commentaire fait au nom

Canadian Brownfield Network Technical Advisory Committee

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The Canadian Brownfields Network (CBN) appreciates the opportunity to participate in the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) invitation to comment with respect to the Proposed amendments to O. Reg. Lire davantage