Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

106064

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This a blatant over-reach by the provincial government in to municiple affairs and it is certainly not backed up by any modern understand of how traffic works. More lanes does not reduce traffic. Creating viable alternatives to driving is the only way to reduce traffic. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

106065

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is totally against any scientific data on what reduces road congestion. Removing bike lanes is ridiculous. Harmful for cyclists, harmful for the environment. We should be investing in more public transit and green initiatives, including MORE bike lanes. What a political stunt. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

106066

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

If the goal is to improve traffic flow, and reduce congestion, then I would say that adding more cars to our already congested streets should not be the main priority. More cars are what's causing traffic, and fatalities in our city are at record numbers, especially for cyclists. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

106068

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This bill will do nothing to resolve gridlock, and will only worsen the problem by 'inducing demand' for roads. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

106069

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Gridlock is caused by cars and lanes of traffic. Bike lanes keep me and my family safe. It would be an incredible waste of resources (and make people less safe, and cause more traffic) if this bill passes. Senseless law making that flies against all established research and facts. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

106070

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Don't do this. We need buke lanes. This is backwards. Can't wait to vote this guy out.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

106071

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is disheartening to read Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 and the framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane. I am firmly against Bill 212. The environmental and human health impacts of this Bill are glaring. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

106072

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Ontarians want common sense policies – to get from Point A to Point B safely and securely whether that’s on foot, by bike, by bus, by train, and by car. Bicycles are part of traffic and deserve space on our roads. Municipalities know what their residents are asking for, and it’s safer streets. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

106073

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 212 is a dangerously regressive piece of legislation masquerading as a solution to traffic congestion. In reality, it's an assault on evidence-based urban planning, environmental protection, and local democracy. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

106075

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

1. Why are bike lanes and a highway proposal lumped together? These are very different forms of travel to "save time" Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

106076

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This Bill is an overstep. The province should not have power over how municipalities choose to manage their own roadways. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

106077

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Environmental Assessment Concerns While the proposal states that "implications to the environment will be considered," this approach appears insufficient given your SEV commitments to: "Integrate sustainability into the ministry's decision making, programs, policies and operations" Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

106078

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Taking out bike lanes is by far the most ridiculous backward thinking I have ever seen.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

106079

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

bill 212 is absolutely abhorrent. it is a cover to allow this corrupt government carte blanche on highway 413. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

106081

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Getting bikes off the road and onto bike lanes reduces congestion and saves lives. This proposed legislation will not reduce gridlock as cyclists. Cyclists aren't even allowed on the 400 series highways where the worse gridlock occurs. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

106083

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bike lanes are a critical safety feature. I wholeheartedly oppose the removal of bike lane infrastructure and the Province’s approach in overstepping municipalities to do so. Safety and road equity is essential, and by taking away bike infrastructure, you are putting people’s lives at high risk. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

106085

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This bill is an overstep of the provincial government attempting to wrest further control from municipalities in order to further the agenda of the developer-aligned premier. Lire davantage