Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

107114

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to oppose the proposed bill that seeks to remove bike lanes in an effort to improve commuting speeds for vehicles. This measure, while well-intentioned, is counterproductive. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

107115

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Stop thinking so small guys. Build new highways AND roads with bike paths AND public transit AND more housing AND more industry - do it ALL Dougie. This is not a request.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

107116

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

How does this act actually accomplish eliminating gridlock on Hwy 400, Hwy 401 or DCP (Don Valley Parkway) by eliminating local decisions about bike lanes? simple answer it does not - current studies show that bike lanes improve a city & town's traffic patterns. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

107117

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I support removing all these useless bike lanes and having bylaws removed so that cyclists can ride on the sidewalks. They impede traffic and all the studies that say otherwise are based on European cities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

107118

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As an Ontario resident and Canadian citizen, I wholeheartedly support this plan Come and see, please, the mess that is Waterloo On. Begin with Philip St. And branch out. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

107119

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support Bill 212. It is provincial overreach and disappointingly short sighted. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

107121

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

there’s plenty of evidence that reducing cars on the road reduces traffic. there’s evidence that increases lanes does not solve rush hour, only more cars stuck during rush hour. bikes will still be on the road, but now taking up lanes. it’s ridiculous to remove bike lanes. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

107122

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I disagree with the proposal that building highways faster will reduce gridlock. I would rather see my tax dollars invested in better public transit and increasing road safety for all citizens including cyclists and pedestrians. I only began commuting by bike to my office on King St. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

107123

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I oppose this bill. Traffic regulations should be a municipal issue. Furthermore, bike lanes improve the long-term scalability of our transit infrastructure while expanding roads does not. It's easy to push for larger road expansions but it quickly becomes more expensive with diminishing returns. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

107124

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We need bike lanes! It’s how I get to work without a car, we need to encourage city design to be conducive to pedestrians and reducing reliance on cars!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

107125

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposal is not founded in any sort of fact. Increasing car lanes, especially at the expense of bike lanes, will worsen congestion. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

107126

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Reducing gridlock is a great idea, that can only be accomplished by increasing alternate transportation methods such as bike lanes, transit, and more walkable cities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

107127

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Removing bike lanes will not reduce gridlock. Trains transit and more ways for people to get around are needed. Bikes improve health. Not to mention cities know what they need

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

107128

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We need more, not fewer, bike lanes. Having safe and segregated pedestrian and bike lanes increases the ability for people to safely and confidently travel. In addition, we don't need the province to dictate the will of the municipalities.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

107129

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Putting bikes back on the road will absolutely worsen traffic, not make it better. We need bike lanes to keep bikes off the road itself. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

107130

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The provisions in this bill about the removal of bike lanes is a populist, unscientific PR stunt that is pandering to right wing voters in advance of a future election. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

107133

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I think that bike lanes promote a better urban environment for all. Motorists get most cyclists out of traffic lanes and know where to expect them. Cyclists get separated lanes, pedestrians get more distance between them and traffic. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

107134

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is an insane idea and waste of money, similar to ripping out electric charging stations. This energy and money should be spent ensuring transit projects like Ottawa’s LRT and others get completed and have reliable service.