Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

121804

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 212 is overbroad, and reactive policy that risks serious harm to the environment, the rights of property owners facing expropriation, and the safety of cyclists. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

121805

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I live very close to Bloor St W and totally support this bill and the bike lane removal.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

121808

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 212 is obviously a political ploy to score points and undercut Toronto. "Traffic" is NOT a good thing. Putting more of it back in our city helps no-one. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

121809

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Dear Premier Ford, I would like to express my dismay about Bill 212. This widely unpopular proposed legislation would be an extreme overreach into municipal jurisdiction. It goes against science, which overwhelmingly shows bike lines in fact reduce traffic, not cause it (1,2). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

121810

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Remove the bicycle lanes on Bloor and Yonge and University. They are mostly unused, create congestion, and they are actually dangerous to cyclists. They will never be used in the winter. Put bicycle lanes in sensibly. They should go on secondary routes.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

121813

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Mississauga

Statut du commentaire

I am pleased to provide comments on behalf of the City of Mississauga regarding the Government of Ontario’s proposed Bill 212 “Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024” and the proposed framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

121814

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I’m in full agreement of this proposal and I’m very hopeful it will actually be implemented. Huge thanks to the provincial government for stepping up. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

121815

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I approve of the removal of the bike lanes. No referendum was taken in their implementation. They have caused difficulties, financial hardship and massive, unnecessary inconvenience. Emergency Services are delayed. Seniors cannot get around as much or as easily. Driver frustration is huge. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

121816

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I don't support this bill. I am a regular cyclist who uses these routes multiple times per week.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

121817

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This bill will be a disaster if it goes through. The city wont be the same. We’ll still have cyclists like me but they’ll have to ride unsafely. I’ve been hit by a car before and I don’t want to experience that ever again. This is a giant step back, please do not do this.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

121818

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a parent and resident of Toronto who has used and benefitted from the careful planning and implementation of bicycle infrastructure, I'm flabbergasted by this bill's proposition that bike lanes are a problem. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

121819

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed changes to the law will put cyclists in harm's way and will not accomplish the stated goal of reducing motor vehicle traffic congestion. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

121820

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I disagree with the bike lane removal bill. The joke lanes are needed. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

121823

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Removing bike lanes on major streets downtown Toronto is not only dangerous but a waste of money.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

121824

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not agree with this approach and proposal. We need more non-vehicle infrastructure to alleviate gridlock. Bike lanes and bike infrastructure are part of that.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

121826

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Ref: ERO Number 019-9266 I am opposed to Bill 212 inappropriately titled “Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.” Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

121827

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I commute 100% by bicycle year round. Without bike lanes, I’m at significantly increased risk of injury or death due to cars. My health and safety is being politicized; bike lanes must remain intact and continue to develop for the good of all Torontonians.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

121828

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The update to Bill 212 that would see the province weighing in on the creation of proposed bike lanes and the insistence on the removal of existing bike lanes in municipalities throughout Ontario is irresponsible and damaging to public safety, traffic management, environment and health outcomes, and Lire davantage