Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

170579

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
If this legislation passes, it will signal that Canada has chosen development over life, industry over ecosystems, and silence over science. We will be remembered for what we allowed to die under our watch.

Comment ID

170581

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is not regulatory reform—it is mass deregulation. When you remove 106 species from the endangered list in one motion, you are not acting cautiously or responsibly. You are gambling with extinction. Read more

Comment ID

170582

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Endangered species protections were created as a fail-safe. To dismantle them now, during a time of global ecological emergency, is not just negligent—it’s historically shameful. This will not be forgotten.

Comment ID

170583

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There is no recovery without protection. These species are already at the brink. To remove legal safeguards is to push them over the edge. You cannot claim to value biodiversity and pass this amendment.

Comment ID

170584

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Removing protections doesn’t make the species less endangered. It just makes it easier to ignore them. These legal changes will not erase the ecological collapse—they’ll just ensure we don’t respond to it.

Comment ID

170585

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
When the endangered list becomes a tool of convenience instead of a tool of truth, it loses all meaning. These amendments gut the integrity of environmental law. What follows will be silence, not stewardship.

Comment ID

170586

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The endangered species list is a reflection of our priorities. If we let governments rewrite it to suit economic goals, we’re announcing that life has no value unless it profits us. This must be stopped.

Comment ID

170587

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Environmental protection is supposed to be a safeguard against short-term thinking. These amendments do the opposite. They hand over long-term survival to short-term interests. That is a catastrophic miscalculation.

Comment ID

170589

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There is no justification for removing legal protection from over a hundred species at once. If even one of those removals leads to extinction, the cost is permanent. This amendment doesn’t just risk that—it guarantees it.

Comment ID

170590

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Wildlife protection is not a privilege the government can grant and revoke at will. It is a duty, written into our environmental commitments. This amendment turns that duty into a loophole, and it must be rejected outright.

Comment ID

170591

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
If a single habitat is destroyed because this amendment passed, it’s one too many. If even one species goes extinct from deregulation, the government becomes complicit. This is legislation with blood on its hands before it even becomes law.

Comment ID

170592

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These changes weren’t created to protect ecosystems. They were created to clear the way for development. Every species removed from the list is another opportunity for extraction. This is a greenlight for destruction, and we see it clearly.

Comment ID

170593

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Once protections are removed, they rarely return in time. If this amendment passes, we will lose species not because they couldn’t be saved—but because we chose not to save them. There is no defense for that.

Comment ID

170594

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Removing endangered status does not improve the health of a species. It only removes accountability. This amendment is designed to make species disappear from records, not from reality. The extinction will continue—it just won’t be counted.

Comment ID

170595

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This legislation treats biodiversity like a technicality. But these are lives—each species, each habitat, each role in the web. When we erase protections, we erase futures. Nothing about this is defensible.

Comment ID

170596

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Canada cannot claim to be a climate leader while simultaneously removing endangered species protections. These amendments contradict every environmental promise the government has made. You cannot greenwash extinction.

Comment ID

170597

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This isn’t about balance. It’s about erasure. Conservation without legal teeth is nothing. These amendments pull those teeth out, one by one, and ask the public to smile. We’re not smiling.

Comment ID

170598

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Biodiversity loss is not theoretical. It’s measurable, it’s accelerating, and it’s global. Canada has a role to play in stopping it—or worsening it. These amendments place us firmly on the side of collapse.

Comment ID

170599

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This act is wildly disrespectful of the people of Ontario and its natural systems that sustain all of us. In difficult economic times parasitic corporations and governments descend to overrule scientific evidence and the needs of everyday people. Read more