Many of the aquatic species being removed from the list are already facing severe habitat fragmentation. Provincial protection offered an additional barrier against development. Without it, industries now face one less challenge to exploiting these waterways.
This is not a case of redundant protection. It is strategic removal. Species most threatened by industrial development are being quietly erased from provincial oversight, leaving only federal systems already overwhelmed and under-enforced.
There is no such thing as too much protection for species at risk—especially aquatic species that are sensitive to chemical contamination, noise disruption, and water level changes. Their removal is about deregulation, not conservation.
Hello, my name is Desiree and I'm a citizen here in Ontario. I oppose these changes and demand Bill 5 be repealed, including restoring protections for our environment and the at-risk and endangered species here in Ontario. Thank you.
Aquatic ecosystems require precise, overlapping, and multi-jurisdictional protections. By retreating from responsibility, Ontario is helping ensure that harm will fall through the cracks. And when it does, it will be irreversible.
The removal of aquatic species is framed as “avoiding duplication.” In truth, it’s a cost-saving maneuver that benefits developers. Species don’t survive on paperwork—they survive on actual, enforceable barriers to harm. This amendment guts those barriers.
A species is not endangered in isolation. It is endangered because its home is under attack. By weakening habitat protections through registration and exception clauses, the SCA allows development to chip away at the very ground species depend on.
You cannot protect species without protecting habitat. The SCA allows harmful activities to proceed with permits, or worse, without any permit at all. This is how you legalize extinction—not by direct violence, but by removing shelter.
Habitat fragmentation leads to reproductive collapse, loss of migration routes, increased predation, and starvation. The more these laws weaken core habitat protections, the more they guarantee the long-term loss of entire ecosystems.
Species are woven into systems. Remove their habitat, and you unravel everything connected to them—pollinators, seed dispersers, predators, prey. The SCA treats each species as a separate checkbox, ignoring the deep interdependence that defines life.
Development approvals under the SCA are structured to proceed quickly, with mitigation only required “where possible.” This leaves species in the position of adapting to destruction, rather than being protected from it. That is policy cruelty disguised as compromise.
Every species removed from protection represents an area of land or water that becomes open for exploitation. The real targets of this amendment are not just plants and animals—they’re forests, wetlands, breeding grounds, and migration corridors.
Ecological collapse doesn’t happen all at once—it happens in increments: a permit here, an exception there, a habitat sliced into parts. This amendment accelerates those cuts while pretending the system can hold. It won’t.
The registration model lets developers write their own conservation plans, often with minimal oversight. That is not stewardship—it’s privatized environmental assessment with built-in incentives to minimize or obscure damage.
The idea that habitat damage can be “mitigated” after the fact ignores how many ecosystems are non-recoverable once disturbed. You cannot reassemble a forest, a wetland, or a shoreline once it has been cleared, paved, or drained
Ontario’s ecosystems are already strained by climate pressure, invasive species, and pollution. Removing legal protections for habitat doesn’t just harm species—it makes entire ecosystems brittle. And when they collapse, recovery is measured in centuries—if it comes at all.
Bill 5 and the SCA ignore Indigenous law, which recognizes species and land as kin, not commodities. Transferring species protection to government permitting frameworks violates both relational ethics and established Indigenous conservation protocols.
Many of the species being removed or deprioritized are of cultural, spiritual, and ecological importance to Indigenous communities. The government's failure to consult Indigenous nations during this overhaul is a breach of both duty and treaty responsibility.
Traditional Ecological Knowledge has kept species alive for millennia. This legislation silences those teachings and replaces them with registration forms. That is colonialism in environmental clothing.
View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.
Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.
Download comments
Many of the aquatic species…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170648
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This is not a case of…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170649
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
There is no such thing as…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170650
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Hello, my name is Desiree…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170651
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Aquatic ecosystems require…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170652
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The removal of aquatic…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170653
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
A species is not endangered…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170655
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
You cannot protect species…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170656
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Habitat fragmentation leads…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170657
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Species are woven into…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170658
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I oppose the changes to…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170659
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Development approvals under…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170660
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Every species removed from…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170661
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Ecological collapse doesn’t…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170662
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The registration model lets…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170663
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The idea that habitat damage…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170664
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Ontario’s ecosystems are…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170665
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Bill 5 and the SCA ignore…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170667
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Many of the species being…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170668
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Traditional Ecological…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170669
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions