Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

170558

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
You can’t legislate away extinction. You can only remove the tools meant to slow it. This proposal removes those tools—and with them, the credibility of any future conservation promises Canada tries to make.

Comment ID

170559

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There’s no such thing as a neutral environmental policy when the consequences are irreversible. These species either remain protected, or they begin the slow slide toward extinction. The government cannot afford to treat that decision lightly.

Comment ID

170561

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These amendments are designed to look like administrative efficiency, but the real cost is life. It’s easier to cut paper than it is to restore ecosystems. Once protections are gone, they rarely come back in time to make a difference.

Comment ID

170562

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We teach our children to respect nature, yet this government proposes legislation that bulldozes that principle. Conservation without integrity is propaganda. If you remove science from the process, you’re not saving nature—you’re selling it.

Comment ID

170564

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
What message does it send to allow a government to erase protections with a signature? That life is negotiable? That extinction is acceptable if it's profitable? This isn't policy—it's abandonment, and it must be stopped before the damage is permanent.

Comment ID

170565

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Every species removed is a future memory of what we failed to protect. These amendments don’t just undermine policy—they erase future possibilities. We need to protect what’s left, not hand out permission slips for destruction.

Comment ID

170566

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This legislation pretends to streamline protection, but in reality, it opens the floodgates to development at the cost of life. You cannot streamline extinction. The amendment should be scrapped entirely before irreversible harm is written into law.

Comment ID

170567

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Conservation science exists for a reason—to remove emotion, politics, and profit from decisions about survival. Handing species status to government control reverses decades of hard-won progress and leaves wildlife at the mercy of shifting agendas.

Comment ID

170568

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We are in the midst of a biodiversity crisis. Slashing protections now is like throwing away a life raft during a flood. These species are indicators of ecosystem health. If they go, we all follow. This amendment is ecological suicide.

Comment ID

170569

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Removing 106 species from the endangered list is not a clerical update. It’s a mass deregulation event with catastrophic ecological consequences. There is no way to justify this beyond the prioritization of corporate gain over planetary survival.

Comment ID

170570

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This proposal is an insult to the scientists, activists, and Indigenous land defenders who have spent years fighting to protect these species. It dismisses their work, their warnings, and the truth of what’s happening on the ground.

Comment ID

170571

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Letting the government rewrite the endangered species list is like letting a fire marshal redefine what counts as a fire—while the building is still burning. These decisions belong in the hands of those with no stake in the outcome.

Comment ID

170572

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Protecting species is not a partisan issue. These amendments are a quiet attack on accountability, wrapped in legal language. Wildlife does not get second chances. We must act as if each life matters—because it does.

Comment ID

170573

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This legislation is the legal equivalent of a bulldozer. Once it's passed, habitat will be cleared, protections will be erased, and industry will claim victory. The cost? Irreplaceable species. The loss? Ours to carry forever.

Comment ID

170574

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Every species you eradicate upsets the balance of nature. Without protecting our wildlife and their habitats you are condemning future generations to the consequences of destroying nature. Our future is bleak with the damage your government is doing to our environment. Read more

Comment ID

170575

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
No democratic society should allow the same body that profits from development to decide which lives are worth saving. These amendments collapse the wall between governance and greed. They are a threat to every endangered species in this country.

Comment ID

170576

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The 106 species facing delisting are only the beginning. If this proposal passes, it sets a precedent for future cuts, future rollbacks, future extinctions. This isn’t just about now—it’s about everything we’ll lose next.

Comment ID

170577

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Endangered species status should be a shield, not a target. This amendment turns protection into vulnerability by giving governments the power to erase it when it becomes inconvenient. That’s not conservation—it’s betrayal

Comment ID

170578

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These species are disappearing because of us—habitat destruction, pollution, climate change, and relentless expansion. To then remove their protections is like striking the final blow and pretending it’s mercy. The public sees through this.