Bill 5 is not a conservation bill—it’s a development bill wearing a green mask. By repealing the Endangered Species Act and replacing it with the SCA, Ontario has turned species protection into a system of permits, registrations, and exceptions. That is not protection. That is controlled demolition.
Schedule 2 of Bill 5 guts the Endangered Species Act while pretending to modernize it. The new Species Conservation Act centralizes power in the government’s hands and reduces species protection to a checkbox process. Science no longer leads. Profit does.
The shift from evidence-based species designation to government-controlled permitting opens the door to unchecked destruction. These changes don’t streamline conservation—they weaponize it. Species can now be erased by omission, deregulation, or silence. The SCA is not an upgrade.
Read more
The registration and exception model introduced under the SCA is a blueprint for legalizing harm. It sets the default to “yes” for destruction, with only mild procedural barriers. It weakens the system so thoroughly that protection becomes optional.
The removal of aquatic species and federally protected migratory birds from the Ontario list is not efficiency—it’s abandonment. Duplicated protection was never the problem. The problem is that these species are dying, and this legislation is accelerating their disappearance.
With Bill 5, Ontario has created an endangered species system where exemptions can be stacked, registrations rushed, and destruction made invisible. The government calls it modernization. In reality, it’s a deregulation scheme with irreversible consequences.
Repealing the ESA during a biodiversity crisis is indefensible. Replacing it with legislation that hands out exceptions before protections are even enforced is a betrayal of every species depending on human restraint. This is not legislation—it’s permission to vanish.
The Species Conservation Act strips away ecological protections in order to enable development. It’s built to serve industries, not ecosystems. From habitat destruction to species removal, the SCA formalizes loss—and calls it balance.
The 64 special concern species dropped from the protected list, along with 42 aquatic and migratory species, represent more than just data points. These are frontline victims of deregulation. The SCA removes them from sight, but not from risk. This is environmental erasure.
Removing aquatic species from Ontario’s protection list because they are “already covered” federally is a dangerous abdication of responsibility. Dual protection was never the problem—mass extinction is. Ontario should reinforce protections, not dismantle them.
Aquatic ecosystems are collapsing under the weight of pollution, habitat loss, overfishing, and climate change. The SCA’s removal of 42 aquatic species from provincial protection is not coordination—it’s jurisdictional dodgeball. Lives are being passed around until they disappear.
Just because a species is protected federally doesn’t mean it’s safe. Provincial permits, resource extraction, and infrastructure development often bypass federal enforcement. Duplicated protections existed to catch what one system missed. Removing them is reckless.
Water crosses boundaries. Watersheds, rivers, migratory routes—none of them obey provincial lines. By offloading protection to federal acts, Ontario is effectively removing itself from any meaningful responsibility for aquatic survival.
About Canadian Renewable Energy Association (CanREA)
CanREA is the leading national industry association advocating for wind energy, solar energy, energy storage and behind-the-meter solar & storage solutions in support of a reliable, affordable, and non-emitting electricity system.
Read more
The so-called “streamlining” of species protection means that industries impacting aquatic habitats will now face fewer roadblocks. This includes dam projects, pipelines, dredging, mining, and waste discharge. The SCA has legalized shortcuts to ecosystem collapse.
Many of the aquatic species being removed from the list are already facing severe habitat fragmentation. Provincial protection offered an additional barrier against development. Without it, industries now face one less challenge to exploiting these waterways.
The fact that this is even up for debate in 2025 shows the profound lack of good judgement from the Ford government. I am deeply disappointed that Ford continues to prioritize his corporate greed over every plant, animal, and person in the province. NO to removing environmental protections.
Read more
View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.
Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.
Download comments
Bill 5 is not a conservation…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170628
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Schedule 2 of Bill 5 guts…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170629
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The shift from evidence…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170630
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The registration and…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170631
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The removal of aquatic…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170632
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
With Bill 5, Ontario has…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170633
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Repealing the ESA during a…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170634
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The Species Conservation Act…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170635
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The 64 special concern…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170636
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Imperative to not remove …
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170637
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Removing aquatic species…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170638
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Aquatic ecosystems are…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170639
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Just because a species is…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170640
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This legislation should…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170641
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Water crosses boundaries…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170642
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
About Canadian Renewable…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170643
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The so-called “streamlining”…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170644
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Many of the aquatic species…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170645
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I opposed Bill 5. We must…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170646
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The fact that this is even…
Comment on
Proposed legislative and regulatory amendments to enable the Species Conservation Act, 2025
Comment ID
170647
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions