Rentals of software licenses should be an eligible expense. Many, if not most exploration companies use a variety of software to execute exploration programs. Whether those be for logging drill core, 3D modelling, geological interpretation, airborne interpretation etc.
Read more
I believe drill core re-logging should be an assessable credit. This does not involve new drilling but we have hundreds of thousands of metres of core drilled by previous owners that we want to re-log which takes geologists time to do. This is a very valuable exploration tool that we rely on.
Read more
I disagree with the technical standards required for Airborne Geophysical surveys (non drone). Because these represent larger areas, some of the technical standards become extremely tedious. These include the table of claims/cell IDs covered and the historical work aspect of the area flown.
Read more
There is no mention of which work requires sign-off from qualified personnel, or what those qualifications would need to be. Are we to assume they are not necessary anymore? If so, that is fine, but please be explicit about this.
Read more
Capping a prospector day rate at $350 a day is not fair, especially for performing work types other than grassroots exploration. All grassroots exploration expenses should be awarded at a rate of 100% to assessment credit.
Read more
Nov. 2nd, 2022
To whom it may concern:
Re: Draft Policy document Assessment Work-Costs
There are a number of concerns regarding the new proposed Assessment Work Polices, contained in the document : Draft Policy, Assessment Work-Costs dated July 2022.
Read more
ERO Number 019-0653
I read through the Assessment Work Policy and found two concerning points. The second one being most concerning.
Under the Draft Assessment Work Policy:
Pg 4
Read more
019-0653,
I don't understand why there is a limit on how much can be charged for work on a mining claim by the claim holder. This rule favours the rich and descriminates against small people using their own money.
My name is Randy Stewart I am a geologist, a prospector, and a claim holder. I disagree with capping the work allotment to $350 per day for claim holders performing their own work. I believe this is discriminatory. The prospector should receive the same pay allocation as a contractor.
Read more
It appears that diamond prospecting at the grass roots stage may not be well understood, and it would be helpful/instructive to more clearly define/elaborate upon in the policy description of grass roots prospecting.
Read more
This comment is from the Northwestern Ontario Prospectors Association (NWOPA); it is submitted without registration so as not to be ascribed to any member of the Association or its Directors.
Read more
The policy should not state specific limits on rates that can be influenced through time by many factors. If anything, these should be tied to a sliding scale that is tied to sensitive.
Read more
View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.
Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.
Download comments
Rentals of software licenses…
Comment on
New Assessment Work Policies – Work Types, Costs and Allocations
Comment ID
61559
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I believe drill core re…
Comment on
New Assessment Work Policies – Work Types, Costs and Allocations
Comment ID
61561
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I disagree with the…
Comment on
New Assessment Work Policies – Work Types, Costs and Allocations
Comment ID
61791
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
There is no mention of which…
Comment on
New Assessment Work Policies – Work Types, Costs and Allocations
Comment ID
62026
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Capping a prospector day…
Comment on
New Assessment Work Policies – Work Types, Costs and Allocations
Comment ID
62033
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Nov. 2nd, 2022 To whom it…
Comment on
New Assessment Work Policies – Work Types, Costs and Allocations
Comment ID
62106
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
3 November 2022 RE: Draft…
Comment on
New Assessment Work Policies – Work Types, Costs and Allocations
Comment ID
62167
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
ERO Number 019-0653 I read…
Comment on
New Assessment Work Policies – Work Types, Costs and Allocations
Comment ID
62176
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
019-0653, I don't understand…
Comment on
New Assessment Work Policies – Work Types, Costs and Allocations
Comment ID
62184
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
To whom it may concern, I…
Comment on
New Assessment Work Policies – Work Types, Costs and Allocations
Comment ID
62270
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
My name is Randy Stewart I…
Comment on
New Assessment Work Policies – Work Types, Costs and Allocations
Comment ID
62623
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
ERO 019-0653 Please add more…
Comment on
New Assessment Work Policies – Work Types, Costs and Allocations
Comment ID
62674
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
It appears that diamond…
Comment on
New Assessment Work Policies – Work Types, Costs and Allocations
Comment ID
62693
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This comment is from the…
Comment on
New Assessment Work Policies – Work Types, Costs and Allocations
Comment ID
62696
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The policy should not state…
Comment on
New Assessment Work Policies – Work Types, Costs and Allocations
Comment ID
62704
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Hello, Thank you for…
Comment on
New Assessment Work Policies – Work Types, Costs and Allocations
Comment ID
62712
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions