Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

61559

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Rentals of software licenses should be an eligible expense. Many, if not most exploration companies use a variety of software to execute exploration programs. Whether those be for logging drill core, 3D modelling, geological interpretation, airborne interpretation etc. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

61561

Commentaire fait au nom

Ring of Fire Metals (formerly Noront Resources)

Statut du commentaire

I believe drill core re-logging should be an assessable credit. This does not involve new drilling but we have hundreds of thousands of metres of core drilled by previous owners that we want to re-log which takes geologists time to do. This is a very valuable exploration tool that we rely on. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

61791

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I disagree with the technical standards required for Airborne Geophysical surveys (non drone). Because these represent larger areas, some of the technical standards become extremely tedious. These include the table of claims/cell IDs covered and the historical work aspect of the area flown. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

62026

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There is no mention of which work requires sign-off from qualified personnel, or what those qualifications would need to be. Are we to assume they are not necessary anymore? If so, that is fine, but please be explicit about this. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

62033

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Capping a prospector day rate at $350 a day is not fair, especially for performing work types other than grassroots exploration. All grassroots exploration expenses should be awarded at a rate of 100% to assessment credit. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

62106

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Nov. 2nd, 2022 To whom it may concern: Re: Draft Policy document Assessment Work-Costs There are a number of concerns regarding the new proposed Assessment Work Polices, contained in the document : Draft Policy, Assessment Work-Costs dated July 2022. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

62176

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

ERO Number 019-0653 I read through the Assessment Work Policy and found two concerning points. The second one being most concerning. Under the Draft Assessment Work Policy: Pg 4 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

62184

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

019-0653, I don't understand why there is a limit on how much can be charged for work on a mining claim by the claim holder. This rule favours the rich and descriminates against small people using their own money.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

62623

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

My name is Randy Stewart I am a geologist, a prospector, and a claim holder. I disagree with capping the work allotment to $350 per day for claim holders performing their own work. I believe this is discriminatory. The prospector should receive the same pay allocation as a contractor. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

62674

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

ERO 019-0653 Please add more work types for drilling including drill core logging and drill core sampling in MLAS. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

62693

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It appears that diamond prospecting at the grass roots stage may not be well understood, and it would be helpful/instructive to more clearly define/elaborate upon in the policy description of grass roots prospecting. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

62696

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This comment is from the Northwestern Ontario Prospectors Association (NWOPA); it is submitted without registration so as not to be ascribed to any member of the Association or its Directors. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

62704

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The policy should not state specific limits on rates that can be influenced through time by many factors. If anything, these should be tied to a sliding scale that is tied to sensitive. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

62712

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hello, Thank you for publishing this, lots of work required to make these regulations relevant to the stakeholders and modern. A few notes: Lire davantage