Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment on

Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan

Comment ID

73870

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Building in the green belt does not solve the housing issues today. I am a young conservative voter who has voted in the last 3 elections. I will no longer be voting conservative after hearing about the green belt, highway 413 and the state of our hospitals Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan

Comment ID

73872

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I think this is a bad idea and am against the proposal. Yes we need more housing and you've been given recommendations that can do this without going into the greenbelt. We're already trying to combat the effects of climate change, don't make it worse simply to make profit for corporations. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan

Comment ID

73873

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please reread your own task force’s report it states that development in the green belt isn’t needed no would make a significant impact in getting us more houses. Why bother with a report if you were just going to ignore it and waste tax payer dollars on it? Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan

Comment ID

73874

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This plan is an ecological disaster that will do nothing to ameliorate the housing crisis. We need changes to density and an end to single family housing zoning. By paving the greenbelt we open residents to flooding and we are going to cripple our food production during a period of climate change. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan

Comment ID

73875

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is an embarrassment. Public land should serve the public not politicians political buddies. Where the guarantee this land/housing will benefit the people Where the guarantee they wont build large unaffordable (for most) homes and just rent them out at extremely high rates. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan

Comment ID

73878

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am opposed to development on the greenbelt. One farmland and natural area have been developed there is no way to get that land back. The loss of vital farm land, wetlands, and other environmentally sensitive areas will negatively impact Ontario for ever. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan

Comment ID

73886

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This proposal is an absolute sham and borderline criminal. It is particularly insulting as it stands to enrich developpers with NO GUARANTEE of benefits to the public. PUBLIC LAND SHOULD SERVE THE PUBLIC. If it is to be developped, it should be guaranteed community housing / afforbable housing. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan

Comment ID

73887

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I question the density of housing that will be built on this land. Large properties with detached homes for the wealthy are not worth sacrificing the greenbelt for and will do little to ease the housing crises which is affecting those with less means. Read more

Related actions