Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

93741

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I object to the changes in how aggregate extraction permits are to be approved, given the effect pits and quarries can have on communities, neighbours, traffic, the environment, property values, and quality of life. Read more

Comment ID

93750

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am in support of maintaining regulations for stormwater management. Improper management of wastewater and stormwater has the potential to cause serious impacts to human and environmental health. Read more

Comment ID

93753

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Improper management of wastewater and stormwater has the potential to cause serious impacts to human and environmental health. With proper REGULATIONS and MONITORING, stormwater can fulfill public needs, social equity and enhance food security. Read more

Comment ID

93757

Commenting on behalf of

Oxford Environmental Action Committee

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Regarding: Our Sept 18, 2023 Request for Extension of Public Comment Periods for ERO Numbers 019-6928, 019-6853, 019-6963, and 019-6951 to a Minimum of 145 Days Dear Hon. Andrea Khanjin, Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, Read more

Comment ID

93764

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am writing in opposition of the ERO# 019-6928. With recent and ongoing dealings with the aggregate industry, I see nothing but turmoil for communities, our ecosystems, drinking water and our health should such a proposal be allowed to pass. Read more

Comment ID

93774

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am deeply disturbed by many of the changes to streamline permits and environmental permissions in Ontario, including ERO number 019-6951, ERO number 019-6853, ERO number 019-6963, and ERO number 019-6928. Read more

Comment ID

93776

Commenting on behalf of

Rescue Lake Simcoe Coalition

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
1. Exploring changes to streamline the permit-by-rule framework, ERO number 019-6951 ero.ontario.ca/notice/019-6951 Dear Sirs, I do not support the regulatory changes proposed. Surely, there are ways to improve efficiency without removing oversight and review prior to approval. Read more

Comment ID

93777

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The government of Ontario MUST continue to allow public input regarding aggregate pits and water taking. To do otherwise would allow life- changing environmental issues to be put forward without public scrutiny and transparency. Read more

Comment ID

93782

Commenting on behalf of

Drewlo Holdings

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
See comments in the attached document. Simplifying regulations and eliminating red tape (perceived intent of this change) to get houses to market faster is applauded by our industry. Read more

Comment ID

93803

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As a resident of Ontario, I am opposed to this for these reasons: • I insist that public consultation MUST be formally included in the application process • I insist that Conservation Authorities MUST be involved in planning and oversight of stormwater management on these sites Read more

Comment ID

93805

Commenting on behalf of

City of Burlington

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
1. Preparing a monitoring plan should not be solely left to the LEP. It should be reviewed and approved before being accepted for registration. 2. MNRF and municipal consultation for the monitoring plan is not sufficient. The LEP should obtain a sign-off from both agencies. Read more

Comment ID

93807

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I strongly disagree with your proposal to reduce the regulations governing the management of stormwater in Ontario. For one thing, your proposal is based on a wrong assumption; that 'activities registered on the EASR must follow rules in regulation'. Read more

Comment ID

93812

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am very worried about the intentions of the ERO to cut corners and streamline important safe guards. Which will let some companies and industries police themselves and I'm very much against that. Read more

Comment ID

93817

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I insist: insisting that public consultation MUST be formally included in the application process insisting that Conservation Authorities MUST be involved in planning and oversight of stormwater management on these sites Read more