This is completely unnecessary and just as disingenuous and ill-gotten an idea as removing lands from the Greenbelt and redrawing municipal boundaries to further chip away at protected areas and our waters for the sake of private business profit.
Read more
I am against this proposal. The environment should be protected and there should be no shortcuts to obtaining this permit. The long term success of Ontario and Canada depend on it.
Hi,
I very much disagree with the proposed changes.
You start by saying that "Good management of stormwater is an important part of ensuring Ontario has clean water for drinking, manufacturing products and recreational activities now and into the future."
Read more
I oppose removing approvals, or allowing self registration and reporting for any environmental issue. It has been made clear for decades that when the power of self-regulation has been given to companies and potential polluters, the environment has suffered.
Read more
Developers should have to pay extra to ensure proper infrastructure is in place to handle storm water. The Cost should then be passed down to the purchaser. If the purchaser is not an individual, the fee should triple
Absolutely not. This PC gov has lost all public trust with how they have been operating I regards to developers. From Greenbelt, MZO, Ontario place to only name a few, allowing developers to bypass permit review is the most ridiculous thing ever
I have zero faith that anything that this government does, let alone removing oversight from corporate interests, is for the benefit of the typical ontarian.
Read more
Permits and approvals keep us and our environment safe. No oversight will ensure our safety and environmental health is compromised. Short term gain to the long term detriment of our people and ecosystems.
Halton Region's comments on the following Proposals:
Streamlining permissions for water takings for construction site dewatering activities and foundation drains
Streamlining Permissions for Stormwater Management
Permit-By-Rule Framework
Read more
this proposal as it would bypass their engineering/ surface- and groundwater review process and essentially undo the last 40 years of improvements to environmental protection
Public consultation should always be available in application processes. Conservation authorities must be involved in planning and oversight on stormwater management on any site.
Read more
Absolutely not. Who benefits from this proposal? Definitely NOT the people, environment, and water shed system. There are approval requirements for a REASON for the safety of our local residents and environment.
Read more
I am strongly opposed to this. This is placing way too much trust in developers, who time after time have demonstrated their greed and their prioritization of profits over safety. This hides behind the guise of supporting housing needs in a time of crisis but this is a massive safety oversight.
This cannot be allowed. The environmental disaster caused by the Brenntag fire should be evidence enough that this is not a place to be cutting 'red tape'. More accountability and environmental oversight is needed, not the opposite.
View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.
Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.
Download comments
This is completely…
Comment on
Streamlining environmental permissions for stormwater management under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry
Comment ID
94143
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am against this proposal…
Comment on
Streamlining environmental permissions for stormwater management under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry
Comment ID
94147
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Hi, I very much disagree…
Comment on
Streamlining environmental permissions for stormwater management under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry
Comment ID
94148
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I oppose removing approvals,…
Comment on
Streamlining environmental permissions for stormwater management under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry
Comment ID
94150
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I strongly support…
Comment on
Streamlining environmental permissions for stormwater management under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry
Comment ID
94151
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Developers should have to…
Comment on
Streamlining environmental permissions for stormwater management under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry
Comment ID
94152
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Absolutely not. This PC gov…
Comment on
Streamlining environmental permissions for stormwater management under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry
Comment ID
94153
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I have zero faith that…
Comment on
Streamlining environmental permissions for stormwater management under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry
Comment ID
94155
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Permits and approvals keep…
Comment on
Streamlining environmental permissions for stormwater management under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry
Comment ID
94157
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Getting rid of environmental…
Comment on
Streamlining environmental permissions for stormwater management under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry
Comment ID
94158
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
We need STRONGER protections…
Comment on
Streamlining environmental permissions for stormwater management under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry
Comment ID
94160
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Short sighted proposal in…
Comment on
Streamlining environmental permissions for stormwater management under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry
Comment ID
94161
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This is a gross overstepping…
Comment on
Streamlining environmental permissions for stormwater management under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry
Comment ID
94167
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Halton Region's comments on…
Comment on
Streamlining environmental permissions for stormwater management under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry
Comment ID
94169
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
this proposal as it would…
Comment on
Streamlining environmental permissions for stormwater management under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry
Comment ID
94171
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Public consultation should…
Comment on
Streamlining environmental permissions for stormwater management under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry
Comment ID
94174
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Absolutely not. Who benefits…
Comment on
Streamlining environmental permissions for stormwater management under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry
Comment ID
94176
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Brenntag fire. You're…
Comment on
Streamlining environmental permissions for stormwater management under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry
Comment ID
94179
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am strongly opposed to…
Comment on
Streamlining environmental permissions for stormwater management under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry
Comment ID
94181
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This cannot be allowed. The…
Comment on
Streamlining environmental permissions for stormwater management under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry
Comment ID
94183
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions