Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

93550

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I, as an individual, agree with the Canadian Environmental Law Association in the following points. *There will not be an up-front, detailed review by Ministry staff to assess the potential environmental impacts of the specified operations Read more

Comment ID

93556

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am providing a single set of comments in response to the policy and regulation proposals in the following postings on the Environmental Registry of Ontario: ERO #019-6951, ERO #019-6853, ERO #019-6963, and ERO #019-6928 ("ERO Proposals"), as these proposals are intended to implement a single packa Read more

Comment ID

93560

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Years ago the Canadian government pledged to fight climate change to help slow down the effects of global warming. Taking such lazy shortcuts goes against the spotless public image Canada would like to present to the global village.

Comment ID

93565

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am a very very concerned citizen who adamantly opposes the streamlining of the permit process. Fast tracking a process, which should take into account a great number of factors before making a decision is risky and careless. Read more

Comment ID

93569

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am very much opposed to this proposed change. I cannot fathom why you would even be considering it. Everything to do with the Health of our province deserves More scrutiny-not less. Please do the Right thing. Read more

Comment ID

93601

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The oversight of all waste in the province should remain open to both government AND public scrutiny. Particularly when it comes to extremely problematic wastes. Read more

Comment ID

93651

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There are major concerns in regard to this proposal as it relates to our community in Porcupine, Ontario. There has been 50 years of sewage bypasses going into our small lake and no one paid attention until concerned residents became vocal due to sewage and toilet paper along their docks, etc. Read more

Comment ID

93668

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
You have got to be kidding?! There is no way that Ontario should open up its unscrupulous waste management industry to self rule and remove the environmental protection we have with the application and approval process. Read more

Comment ID

93677

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
STOP. Do not proceed. This proposal is sacrificing and an affront to environmental rights. You also must get the free, prior, informed consent of all First Nations and Indigenous communities with territory in or significant relationships with the province. Read more

Comment ID

93683

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
"Ontario is working to create smarter and more efficient environmental permissions processes that reduce unnecessary burden for businesses and maintain our province's strict environmental standards." Read more

Comment ID

93686

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
A government that doesn't understand or ignores history is destined to repeat mistakes. Under the Harris Government, efforts to reduce oversight and management of drinking water lead directly to the water tragedy in Walkerton. Read more

Comment ID

93717

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Expediency seems to be the only rationale for adding 6 more categories of waste to the list of wastes that are eligible for registration under EASR. These 6 activities were exempted from eligibility for EASR; what has changed? Read more

Comment ID

93720

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The proposal to streamline approvals for the handling of hazardous waste streams, such as asbestos waste, biomedical waste, and liquid industrial waste, raises significant concerns from both a scientific and safety perspective. Read more

Comment ID

93729

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Waste-management systems that transport and store waste, in particular, asbestos waste, hazardous waste and biomedical waste have the potential to cause serious harm to the natural environment and human health. Read more