Comments

If this concrete plant's main purpose is to supply the chalk River nuclear plant, than the concrete plant should be located on that property. Read more

I do not support an industrial plant in a small village location. There is already a large nuclear plant in the area. Why do we need to take away more nature from a small remote village. Surely there are better places to build this. Read more

Request to deny approval. Airborne alkali contaminants will result in premature corrosion and breakdown of current residential properties as well as town infrastructure. Read more

Before making any COMMENTS on this proposed Concrete Plant in our peaceful Community we must first understand what is the DRIVING FORCE behind this Proposal ERO# 019-7003? For the Answer to that Question click on the attached LINK below: Read more

Since the middle of March 2023, I've been doing a lot of Research on what was actually going on with this Application to REZONE an adjacent RURAL property to include a CONSTRUCTION YARD as a permitted use and discovered that there was also a PLAN to BUILD a CONCRETE PLANT that our Municipal and Coun Read more

I find it very suspicious that when the Town mentions the Concrete Plant, it always describes it as a "portable temporary Concrete Batch Plant" (see attached minutes) on the one hand, in order for it to meet the very vague description of Permitted Use in the Town's Official Plan but when you read th Read more

Today I will begin by saying what I liked the most about this Proposal which is the following: Read more

Now I'd like to COMMENT on the following Section of Proposal (ERO# 019-7003): Supporting materials View materials in person Some supporting materials may not be available online. If this is the case, you can request to view the materials in person. Read more

I'd like to make my final Comment on behalf of all the Earth Creatures who will be IMPACTED by this Proposal if it is given the go-ahead but who are unable to post one themselves to protect their own HABITAT. Read more