Commentaire
I completely disagree with changing the definition of habitat. The change does not reflect the complexity of a non-human organism's reliance on a number of different factors, one of which being its dwelling, in order to survive as a species. It's absolutely unacceptable to push through a change like this, as it will directly harm species at risk, and will no doubt directly lead to more species becoming at risk. there are some positive things about this bill, however the negative points far outweigh the positives. I'm very disappointed to see how Ontario's beautiful ecology will be threatened if this bill goes through.
Soumis le 8 mai 2025 2:00 PM
Commentaire sur
Modifications provisoires proposées à la Loi de 2007 sur les espèces en voie de disparition et proposition de Loi de 2025 sur la conservation des espèces
Numéro du REO
025-0380
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
134738
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire