Commentaire
The definition of a habitat should remain the same. By limiting it you are only looking at what the species directly use and not what they may need in the near or far future. I think it is better to stay on the safer side. Also I do not think the government should have the power to remove a species from the endangered list. If the scientists have deemed a specie to be a risk, it should be protected. I think you should think of the long term goals of the province. We need to protect our biodiversity or else we will suffer too. And requiring a permit allows for the project to be reviewed and for scientists to propose changes. With the registration, irreversible damage could be done. Please prioritize the biodiversity in Ontario.
Soumis le 16 mai 2025 6:39 PM
Commentaire sur
Modifications provisoires proposées à la Loi de 2007 sur les espèces en voie de disparition et proposition de Loi de 2025 sur la conservation des espèces
Numéro du REO
025-0380
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
146163
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire