Commentaire
After our review of Bill 60, and similar to comments presented on Bill 17, it seems clear that the Provincial Government aims to undermine or eliminate municipal government from planning for their own areas. It seems that municipalities do not have jurisdiction to determine their own best course of action in planning matters. Municipalities already experience enough pushbacks without the need to be undermined by the province, giving staff even less support when adhering to policies and rules.
The fact that the PPS, which was created by the Province, is not applicable on any decisions of the MMAH, even retroactively, is underhanded. Is the government not meant to lead by example? Why would this document, one that is and has always been completely impossible to use in the north, which is “essential” to proper planning, be eliminated from the requirements of the body that created it? Simply because they say “This change is intended to grant the Minister with increased flexibility in their decision-making.” If the PPS is not required for decision making for one, then it should be eliminated for all.
Municipal staff and planners are all required to follow the legislation put out by the Province. More and more of that legislation seems to be putting more in the hands of the Province and making local work increasingly difficult with no backing from the body who has all of the power. Oliver Paipoonge would like to maintain the ability to guide its municipality in the way that best suits the area and its goals.
Soumis le 17 novembre 2025 8:05 AM
Commentaire sur
Projet de loi 60 – Loi de 2025 visant à lutter contre les retards et à construire plus rapidement – Soutenir l’harmonisation des normes de construction des routes municipales
Numéro du REO
025-1140
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
171909
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire