This areas seems unclear …

This areas seems unclear
"removing the regulatory burden associated with current static regulatory high-use watershed maps and policies and updating our approach to managing water takings in water-quantity stressed areas, focusing actions in priority areas to allow resources to be directed where they are needed most"

How does removing regulatory "burden"s protect both the water for future uses? If you are implying maintaining a current and "in-real-time" high-use map to help inform policies, that seems like a good idea, if it considers fluctuations in water consumption over the year.