Commentaire
It is irresponsible to sacrifice land that is valuable to many, for luxury residences for a few. This new proposal to reduce the Greenbelt refutes the goals of - and diminishes the government's commitment to - environmental stewardship. The plan instead should promote 'missing middle' development in existing urban boundaries, to avoid highrise hellscapes.
The original boundaries were designed to:
1. Contain flooding
2. Protect sensitive forests, farms, water sources and ecosystems for wildlife, which can’t be relocated
3. Contain new building within urban areas that already have social services, transit, employment
4. Provide leisure areas near cities
5. Reduce commuting times and pollution of transportation
6. Reduce costs of sprawl: construction and maintenance of roads, schools, hospitals, infrastructure.
Expanding the Greenbelt is a great idea. I cycle the river paths and it's a joy to have access to waterways and forests.
Thank you for listening to common sense.
Soumis le 9 novembre 2022 1:51 PM
Commentaire sur
Décision sur les modifications proposées au règlement sur la désignation de la zone de la ceinture de verdure
Numéro du REO
019-6217
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
64649
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire