Commentaire
The lands have been protected for a reason and should remain that way. The Ford government wants to amend the greenbelt boundaries because the Conservatives and Ford will profit. Why did developers recently purchase protected land if they knew it couldn't be developed? That doesn't seem like a good business decision, unless the developers knew something the general public didn't. Perhaps an inquiry is necessary.
What is the point of a government promising to protect land in perpetuity, when a future government can overturn this? Can the public ever trust the promises made?
Why do developers continue to build single family 'monster' homes instead of practical, affordable housing? If land that is currently available for development contained smaller homes, that would partially solve the housing crisis.
Soumis le 3 décembre 2022 8:57 PM
Commentaire sur
Décision sur les modifications proposées au règlement sur la désignation de la zone de la ceinture de verdure
Numéro du REO
019-6217
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
77361
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire