Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2505

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Icall on the provincial government to ensure nuclear emergency response plans are in place to: • Protect people from Fukushima-scale accidents; • Protect vulnerable communities; • Protect drinking water; • Ensure transparency and public participation; Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2506

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

If we must continue with nuclear energy as frightening as this policy is, please work toward realistic preparation for an accident such as that on the scale of Fukushima. To continue on this road to energy production is a "heads in the sand" direction. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2507

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Stop nuclear energy. This is insanity! The world is shutting down its reactors while the Ontario government is trying to fire ours up. My family and friends are shaking our heads in disbelief. [Original Comment ID: 210428]

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2508

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is known (and you know it too) that there is no foolproof way to have nuclear plants that are 100% safe, and there is no way to dispose of nuclear waste except storage (which cannot be guaranteed to be safe). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2510

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I'm writing to express my concern with the aging nuclear power plants within the proximity to toronto (from both Canadian and American borders). I believe we need to have a comprehensive plan in regards to a large scale emergency, not just small scale. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2511

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Ontario needs an emergency nuclear safety plan that protects our water, protects vulnerable communities, is for a Fukushima-scale disaster, ensures transparency and public participation, exceeds international best practices . [Original Comment ID: 210432]

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2514

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We need to have the general public safety at heart , not empty words that no one buys into as actions speak louder than words convince us that you hear the public. We have that right to be heard . [Original Comment ID: 210435]

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2515

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Though I am for Nuclear Power the thought of dealing with a Nuclear disaster needs to be asked of provincial and national leaders. Kindly let Environmental Safety be you first concern and responsibility. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2517

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Why is Ontario not recommending the highest standards of preparation for a nuclear emergency response? I’m assuming that it is to save money?? The risk is continuing to grow as our preparation stagnates. The reactors are aging. The world has witnessed two major accidents—the worst can happen. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2518

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Nuclear power, incompatible with (human) life, should have been abolished a long time ago. Most older reactors are approaching the end of their life span. When they were built in the 60s and 70s it was determined that they would be operational for about 40 years. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2519

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please do the right thing and consider public safety as the number one priority in decisions about nuclear power. Number 2 priority should be safe drinking water. Why should we be considering nuclear power at all- we don't need it. We should be focussing on renewable energy. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2520

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Keeping the Pickering and Darlington Nuclear plants running is putting millions of us at risk. Just because there has not been a major accident here does not mean it cannot still happen. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2523

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please put public safety first. While other developed countries are phasing out nuclear power due to it's inherent dangers and unsustainability, Ontario is turning a blind eye to the sky rocketing costs and putting millions of people at risk. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2529

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

ontario's clinging to the nuclear power option is wrongheaded we need conservation on a large scale to fight climate change clean renewable energy please instead of more of the same i have a nephew living in japan not far from fuskushima get real [Original Comment ID: 210452]