Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20907

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly oppose this extremely short-sighted legislation as it puts the health, safety and well-being of every resident in the province in jeopardy. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20908

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Soil Regulation Task Force

Statut du commentaire

Submission on Bill 66 – Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act, 2018, Schedule 10: “Proposed open-for-business planning tool" (ERO # 013-4125) Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20913

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am very concerned that this open-for-business planning by-law tool will take away local residents' and businesses' voice to be heard. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20919

Commentaire fait au nom

ProtectNatureTO

Statut du commentaire

Proposed open-for-business planning tool ERO 013-4125 Schedule 10 of the proposed legislation would allow municipalities to create an “open-for-business planning by-law” to circumvent planning requirements and land use restrictions under numerous provincial laws, plans and policies. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20926

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support the use of this planning tool. It is undemocratic, the removal of public consultation offensive and as a government planning/tool idea regressive. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20931

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Your government did not get elected on this platform. After hearing from Ontarians that they did not want to see the Greenbelt threatened by development, your government wisely promised not to touch that land. Now, Ontarians want to see that commitment fulfilled.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20953

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66 constitutes an affront to both the environmental conservation and democratic processes of Ontario. The creation of “open-for-business” by-laws will allow for the circumvention of established environmental regulations by municipalities wanting to attract commercial activity. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20973

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This Bill is very concerning to me and my family, and my family in future generations. Many of the provisions in the act would permit unilateral, irreversible, and incontestable changes in the fundamental character of Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20977

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This undermines the intent of the entire planning framework for the Province of Ontario and should be defeated. Business should not have the run of Ontario at the expense of present and future Ontarians.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20980

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I disagree with the proposed Bill 66 in that to make us competitive supposedly we are going to sacrifice environmental safeguards and public safety. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20981

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to you about my key concerns with this proposed bill. ● The proposed changes would roll back the protections that a previous Conservative Government enacted after the Walkerton contaminated water tragedy. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20998

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly oppose Bill 66 for a number of reasons. 1) I am disturbed that there is no way for citizens to appeal open-for-business by-laws to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20999

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Dear Ken Petersen: I am attaching below a copy of comments sent to Michael Helfinger as part of the consultation on Bill 66, Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act, 2018. I would ask that you consider those comments – notably those on Schedule 10 – as part of the consultations on – Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21027

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I spend time in two very different municipalities in Ontario . One is mostly rural and the other is in a municipality with some of the worst air quality in Ontario. I therefore have a vested interest in every issue in this poorly thought out piece of proposed leglislation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21032

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66 will undermine the need for density in development and will allow for urban sprawl to occur. Development needs to occur only in areas where dense development is already occurring. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21034

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support this planning tool. It will support urban sprawl that will increase municipal taxes and add to the burden of public infrastructure. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21040

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a concerned and committed citizen of Ontario, I appeal to our provincial government to repeal Bill 66 and leave in place the Toxics Reduction Act, 2009. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21043

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a concerned and committed citizen of Ontario, I appeal to our provincial government to repeal Bill 66 and leave in place theToxics Reduction Act, 2009. Lire davantage