Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18632

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I live in Parkdale Toronto ON. After much public participation we have Toronto’s agreement to create a Heritage Conservation District of what remains of the 1889 town of Parkdsle. It is the most intact village in the GTA. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18637

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I must voice a strong displeasure with the current regulation being proposed as a part of Bill-66. The 'Open-for-Business' changes to current Planning Act would do little to increase the prosperity of the people of this province. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18780

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The "open-for-business-planning tool" is a very bad idea. It incentivizes municipalities and enables them to bypass all regulations, in particular those that will protect the environment such as the Green Belt. Ontario has lots of land for development that is not in the Green Belt. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18798

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I'm very concerned how this Act will affect built heritage in our province. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18877

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am seriously concerned about the Open for Business Bill 66 that is proposed. I live in a country area inside the Green Belt and am aware of how more Wells, infrastructure and Roads can impact the existing homes and business once more building is allowed. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18913

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a citizen of Port Hope Ontario since 1971, a community that is undergoing a vibrant and successful regeneration thanks to a number of designated structures and the downtown heritage conservation district designation and having been involved in the relocation and restoration of many of these build Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18933

Commentaire fait au nom

Corporation of the County of Bruce

Statut du commentaire

Please find attached comments from the Corporation of the County of Bruce on EBR Registry number 013-4125, Amendments to the Planning Act by Bill 66, “Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act, 2018” Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18950

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I have reviewed the proposed legislative changes referred to as ‘Restoring Ontario's Competitiveness Act, 2018’ or Bill 66. Of great concern to me are the changes which are detailed in: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18961

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please stop and drop Bill 66 Schedule 10. It will allow developers to circumvent the Clean Water Act, the Greenbelt Act, the Great Lakes Protection Act, the Lake Simcoe Protection Act, the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act, the Places to Grow Act, and municipal Official Plans. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18964

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to express my strong opposition to Bill 66 for a number of reasons. I might also add that the guile and haste with which it was introduced and then giving such a brief opportunity for submissions, is very objectionable. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18973

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

am writing to voice my opposition to Bill 66 which, if passed, would undermine many critically important pieces of legislation that were created to protect the people of Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18989

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Brantford

Statut du commentaire

January 17, 2019 Intergovernmental Policy Coordination Unit C/o Michael Helfinger 900 Bay Street, Hearst Block, 17th Floor Toronto, ON M6H 4L1 Dear Sir, Re: Comments from the City of Brantford: ERO posting 013-4125, 013-4239, and 013-4293 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19004

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I concur with the Canadian Environmental Law Association (CELA) when they state that "Bill 66 represents an unprecedented and unacceptable attack on legislative provisions which currently safeguard environmental quality and public health and safety throughout Ontario." Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19018

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am strongly opposed to the open-for-business planning tool. It undermines the Official Plan process by allowing municipalities to go around it. Beyond that, it undermines the municipality's responsibility to its citizens by allowing them to forgo public consultation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19019

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please see attached letter on behalf of the Town of The Blue Mountains Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19049

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66, specifically Schedules 5 and 10, jeopardizes quality of life for Ontarians, present and future. This Bill concerns me in many ways: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19089

Commentaire fait au nom

Gravel Watch Ontario

Statut du commentaire

RE: 013-4293 Bill 66: Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act, 2018; 013-4125 Proposed open-for-business planning tool; 013-4239 New Regulation under the Planning Act for open-for-business planning tool Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19099

Commentaire fait au nom

Region of Waterloo

Statut du commentaire

Please find attached the Region of Waterloo's report as it relates to the Amendments to the Planning Act proposed by Bill 66. The recommendations were approved by Regional Council on January 16, 2019. Recommendation: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19115

Commentaire fait au nom

Town of Mono - Dufferin County

Statut du commentaire

1. Town of Mono is supportive of the general intent of Provincial initiatives to achieve all feasible efficiencies geared toward granting municipal and provincial approvals for economic development and job creation in Dufferin County. Lire davantage