Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20698

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66 is not in the public interest at all. It is the responsibility of all levels of government to protect the environment for future generations. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20699

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am concerned about the proposed changes to the Planning Act that would allow municipalities to make a great number of decisions without oversight at the provincial level, and without needing to notify the public or get input from the public. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20700

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I wish to comment on the proposed changes to the Employment Standards Act. First, I cannot see any cost saving to not requiring employers to post the Employment Standards poster in the workplace. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20701

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hi there. My name is Mackenzie and I am an Ontario resident. My comments are below and I have gotten my information/comments from Ontarionature.org and I totally agree with the following points. Please do not pass this bill! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20704

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Red tape is not made up of rules to keep our environment safe and clean, it is meaningless repetitive form filling, sure combine the information needed for the project, make the forms very clear and identify the information needed to make sure you are not going to damage the environment, and if you Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20707

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Good evening. I live in Toronto, Canada and the comments by Ontario Nature sum up my views well. Ontarians do not want this bill. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20710

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This bill is irresponsible to anyone who needs clean drinking water. I've lived through the Walkerton e-coli scare and that was nothing compared to the devastation this bill could wreak. The costs in lives will far outweigh the dollars.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20711

Commentaire fait au nom

The Corporation of the Town of Collingwood

Statut du commentaire

The Council of the Town of Collingwood have carefully reviewed and considered the contents of Schedule 10 of Bill 66, Restoring Ontario’s Competiveness Act, 2018, which was read for a first time in December. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20712

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Fruit and Vegetable Growers' Association

Statut du commentaire

Please find attached two letters regarding the position of the Ontario Fruit and Vegetable Growers' Association on changes to the Agricultural Employees Protection Act and the Planning Act proposed with Bill 66. Thank you. Gordon Stock gstock@ofvga.org 519-803-8413 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20716

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed changes in this bill, Bill 66 put the public at risk. What the Bill refers to as “red tape and burdensome regulations” have been put into place to protect public health, safety, well-being and resilience. Remember Walkerton! This omnibus bill is undemocratic. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20719

Commentaire fait au nom

Georgian Bay Great Lakes Foundation

Statut du commentaire

Section 10 of Bill 66 is unnecessary, duplicates existing powers, suspends hundreds of policies, is harmful to environmental and public health, threatens the future of sound planning, and subverts democracy in Ontario. We urge you to withdraw Section 10 of Bill 66. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20720

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20721

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66 Schedule 10 scares me knowing that at any time if my municipality chooses to use Schedule 10 at any time, without warning or notice, developers and councilors can, behind closed doors, come up with a bad development proposal . Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20727

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20728

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am very concerned that Bill 66 will reduce or eliminate the protection of environmental and agricultural land protected by the Greenbelt and the Oak Ridges Moraine. There is no correlation between "competitiveness" and the protection of sensitive and important environmental lands. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20731

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I wish to comment on Bill 66's proposed changes to the Labour Relations Act and Agricultural Employees Protection Act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20733

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not suppprt Bill 66. I think it is harmful to farmland and the environment. I think it endangers natural resources that once used for other purposes cannot be returned to farmland. Lire davantage